Talk:South View High School

United States: North Carolina Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	North Carolina portal This article is supported by WikiProject North Carolina (assessed as Low-importance).

Schools

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.

Wikipedians in North Carolina may be able to help!

The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Improvement

This old article has collected no references since it was created in 2007. I looked and found nothing special about the school. I understand that notability is not disproven by the absence of citations, but if twelve years have gone by without any added, I suggest that none are likely to pop up. I don't understand the assertion that the school is "obviously notable." The question is whether high school are assumed to have notability in the absence of sources. Simultaneously, we are arguing about another high school, Denver Online High School, in a discussion here [1], which article does have reliable independent sources. Now that the PROD has been reverted, the next logical step would be AfD, which, I think most will agree, will be a waste of editors' time. Rhadow (talk) 13:21, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]