Talk:Southern Cross Expedition
 | Southern Cross Expedition is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||
 | This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on October 14, 2012. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
 | Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on August 23, 2017, August 23, 2018, August 23, 2021, August 23, 2022, and August 23, 2024. | ||||||||||||
| Current status: Featured article | |||||||||||||
| This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Southern Cross Expedition. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091120185714/http://www.heritage-antarctica.org/english/forgotten-explorer/ to http://www.heritage-antarctica.org/english/forgotten-explorer/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091120185702/http://www.heritage-antarctica.org/english/forgotten-expedition/ to http://www.heritage-antarctica.org/english/forgotten-expedition/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:40, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
Images
[edit]There has been (I don't know when) some rather over-enthusiastic addition of images, creating a rather unsightly clutter. Four images crammed into the lead section was particulary egregious. I have restored some sort of order to the article. Some of the added images were better than the originals, so I've kept these, but generally, I've reduced the number, relocated others, and hopefully restored a tidiness to the article's appearance.
May I suggest that, if an editor wishes to add an image, they don't just stick it in without thought to the presentation of the article? Images are supposed to illustrate, not dominate the text. There's always a case for adding better images, when they become available, but often this needs to be by replacement, rather than addition. Brianboulton (talk) 22:19, 26 September 2019 (UTC)