Jump to content

Talk:Space Battleship Yamato: Resurrection

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]
Distance-Error:

"Massive arks begin evacuating everyone to the planet Amare, which is even further than Iscandar. However, improved tech allows them to warp even faster and get there in a month." <-- not really. If you see the Anime, you see, that Amar is 27.000 lightyears from Earth away. Iscandar is 147.000 Lightyears away, as it was a planet in the Small Magellan's Cloud. The technological jump is, that not only the Yamato, but also bit Archs can make long-distance warps. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.245.254.202 (talk) 23:48, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Aah! I must have been sleepy or something when I wrote that. Geez, did I really write that? What an idiot I am.

Anyways, it's been fixed now, and my failure is preserved in the article revision history. Durrr....*facepalm* — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stevie011 (talkcontribs) 04:48, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Title?

[edit]

So what's the name of this thing? Resurrection or Rebirth? They're used interchangeably but the introduction only identifiers the former, but mentions the latter casually as a synonym.  Xihr  21:28, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unconscious?

[edit]

"The blast from the Wave Motion Gun had ruptured and damaged the Yamato bow and front section; the third bridge (where the ship's navigation room resides) also suffers serious damage, rendering Chief Navigator Maho Orihara, who was working in it, and her assistants unconscious, but the ship is still space-worthy and orbits Earth in triumph."

Were they really just rendered unconscious? The walls of the 3rd bridge seemed to be ripped apart by the battle, and the hexagonal computer screen panels were torn open, so wouldn't the crewmembers on the 3rd bridge be dead from exposure as opposed to being simply unconscious? Or is there another source that confirms otherwise? --Legiondude (talk) 11:46, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]