Talk:Space Shuttle orbiter
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Space Shuttle orbiter article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
"NASA/Rockwell Shuttle" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect NASA/Rockwell Shuttle. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 19#NASA/Rockwell Shuttle until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 12:40, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
Height incorrectly stated as Width (in Infobox)
[edit]The height of the orbiter (17.86 m) is incorrectly shown as its width. I tried editing to change 'Width' to 'Height', but the entry just disappears when I preview. Can somebody with more experience (and an account) check and fix that please?
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by Szmenderowiecki (talk) 02:46, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- ... that one of NASA's Space Shuttle orbiters has more than 2.5 million moving parts? Source: https://phys.org/news/2011-07-shuttle-complex-machine-built.html
- Reviewed:
Created by InvadingInvader (talk). Self-nominated at 02:10, 26 July 2022 (UTC).
Unfortunately, while the hook is interesting to a broad audience, the article does not qualify for DYK. The article has not been created, expanded five-fold, or improved to good article status within the last seven days. As this appears to be your first DYK nomination, I suggest you read WP:DYK and understand the guidelines so that your future nominations will be more successful. If you need any help, the DYKchecker tool is very useful in determining if an article is eligible or not. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 03:19, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
Replica Orbiters
[edit]There is also a full size replica of the left half of Endeavour at the Cosmosphere in Hutchinson, Kansas. I think it would be worth adding it to the list of replicas.
Here is an article from the Cosmosphere that mentions this: https://cosmo.org/blog/view/the-final-launch-of-the-space-shuttle-endeavour Rmcmullin (talk) 21:55, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
- There's surprisingly another missing replica. It goes by the name Ambassador and was at the KSC until the late 90s when it became a traveling exhibit. No clue what happened to it afterwards, but there are some photos still around.
- Alamy Stock Photo of Ambassador
- https://www.flickr.com/photos/bobbex/41365012161
- https://www.flickr.com/photos/amx566/49219369447 TsarDudebroII (talk) 01:03, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
- C-Class spaceflight articles
- High-importance spaceflight articles
- Space stations working group articles
- WikiProject Spaceflight articles
- C-Class aviation articles
- C-Class aircraft articles
- WikiProject Aircraft articles
- WikiProject Aviation articles
- C-Class Rocketry articles
- High-importance Rocketry articles
- WikiProject Rocketry articles
- C-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject United States articles