Talk:Spider-Man Unlimited (video game)
![]() | Spider-Man Unlimited (video game) has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: June 28, 2016. (Reviewed version). |
![]() | A fact from Spider-Man Unlimited (video game) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 21 July 2016 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Plot
[edit]Well, I've merged the plot and gameplay sections but I've been reverted by Darkknight2149. So, I'd like to argue why I thik the plot is unnecessary: it's not a de facto plot; it's only a simple premise to contextualize the game. For what we have now written under the plot section, I guess only until "aide the battle" we really explain the plot. Then we have, "Spider-Man goes after X (his other versions) [the versions are pretty unnecessary and maybe cruft], then goes after Y, and Z." Seriously? I think it can be well handled along with gameplay because it can be explained with the explanation of what is the story mode. Basically, where there is "each issue has five main missions which ends up with a boss fight" we can add the name of the bosses if it is even necessary. Opinions? Gabriel Yuji (talk) 21:58, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
- Nice expansion. I've upped it to B class. My only suggestion would be to paraphrase and situate many of the quotes in the Reception rather than saying X said "Quote", etc. As for the plot, I agree that it isn't necessary, especially as its own section (if at all). Platformers are infamous for not having significant plot. However, it would be would discussing if reliable sources consider the game's plot/setup important by covering it in their articles.
czar ⨹ 21:20, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
- @Gabriel Yuji First, I'd like to thank you for the major improvements you've made to this article. I think the plot is necessary because there IS a story and there are cinematic cut-scenes and I don't really see any reason to merge the section with gameplay because the story and gameplay are mostly separate (albeit influential to each other). However, I believe that to understand the gameplay, you kind of have to understand what is going on, so I think the plot should be placed before the gameplay. Without changing any of the text, I went ahead and moved the plot before the gameplay. Darkknight2149 (talk) 14:05, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Clarification needed
[edit]Hey, Baffle gab1978. First, thank you very much for the thorough copyedit! Second, I'd like to ask if (with this edit) I've clarified the sentence you tagged. Regards, Gabriel Yuji (talk) 03:21, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
Good article
[edit]I just wanted to take a moment to congratulate everyone who helped this article achieve Good Article status, as someone who has been watching this once poorly written article since it was a stub. DarkKnight2149 21:14, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
- Wikipedia good articles
- Video games good articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- GA-Class video game articles
- Low-importance video game articles
- WikiProject Video games articles
- GA-Class Comics articles
- Low-importance Comics articles
- GA-Class Comics articles of Low-importance
- GA-Class Marvel Comics articles
- Marvel Comics work group articles
- GA-Class Spider-Man articles
- Spider-Man work group articles
- WikiProject Comics articles