This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, which has been designated as a contentious topic.
The phrase "scientific consensus" is a broad-brush term used to promote a particular viewpoint and set of beliefs. The "consensus" has been imposed on many in the scientific community who, when they opt out of controversy, are presumed to "consent" to particular theories, even though much of the data supporting these theories is questionable.
the source reference is from Time Magazine, 1974. If there is more current evidence of global cooling, it might be relevant to add that. Otherwise, this is misleading, especially when there is much more rigorous and current study about climate change that disputes this point of view. Madmayday (talk) 13:00, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have adjusted the text so that it reflects what I believe it was intended to mean (that some unnamed "they" was saying in the 1970s that the earth was cooling) versus how you seem to have interpreted it (the earth is cooling). Still, we would be better with a source that references the topic of this article. -- Nat Gertler (talk) 13:10, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I see someone has returned the text to some earlier state, which had several problems (which I've since partially addressed). One is that it paraphrased his quote as saying that the "scientific community" claimed something, and the quotes we have are never that precise; he says "they" said something. One was at least a response to a question that had the word "scientists", but "they say" is such a vaguery that we cannot even assume in that case that's who he meant. The other main problem is that it went on to say that what the subject had said was not true, and that was a statement that had only an internal link rather than a source. Thing is, even if we had a quote from him saying "X" and another source saying "X is not true", we could not put that together here to indicate that what he was saying was not true, because that would be WP:SYNTH. We would need a source specifically saying "Scalise said X, which is not true." -- Nat Gertler (talk) 20:32, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=small}
Done I think anyway? It wasn't in the article when I saw it so presumably someone else has removed it. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 21:38, 11 October 2023 (UTC)