Talk:Strategies for engineered negligible senescence/GA1

GA Review

Remove the bold on "Strategies for Engineered Negligible Senescence (SENS)"
Use double quotes instead of single quotes, like for "'strategies'" → ""strategies""
Format the references according to WP:CITE/ES; it is suggested that {{cite web}} be used, for convenience
The "Major donors", "Methuselah Mouse Prize" sections require references
" Criticism" also requires more references, especially when it is dealing with the sensitive subject of criticisms

Gary King (talk) 23:44, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot Gary King for the review. I just got started working on this article and I needed some pointers. I'll work to address your comments in the coming week. Cheers. --Phenylalanine (talk) 23:58, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi; I realize that this article is a work-in-progress. As such, I recommend the Good Article Nomination for the article be withdrawn, and that a Peer Review at WP:PR be opened instead. You can ask Peer Review volunteers for a review of the article, and to give suggestions. Good Article Nominations normally do not pass if they do not fully meet the Good Article criteria at WP:GA?. Gary King (talk) 00:22, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This article has been withdrawn per this. Gary King (talk) 01:02, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]