Talk:Structured analysis and design technique
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Introductory picture spelt wrong
[edit]It appears that the introductory picture contains a word spelt wrong. I believe it should say "Function," not "Funktion." 130.56.80.103 (talk) 15:14, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
- You are right. The image is in German. -- Mdd (talk) 21:31, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
- I saw that too, so as this is being displayed on the English language Wiki, and the other words are in English, would you be willing to update it to Function? I can fix it, but it would then be in PNG format as I cannot create SVG files. Greyskinnedboy Talk 20:25, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
- If you can do it, that would be great. I have similar problems with SVG files. There seemed to be applications where you can simply alter the words of the SVG file, but I never understood who this works. You should create a new file any way because this image is also used in the German Wikipedia. -- Mdd (talk) 21:57, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
View point of text limited to software engineering
[edit]The article describes functional analysis as "faded away" because of the arrival of object-oriented methods. This may be true for software systems, and for software specialists, but this is not true for systems analysis and systems engineering before the hardware/software separation.
At that level, there are few systems engineers actually using object-oriented methods.
How can this article be written in a more neutral way? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.226.198.190 (talk) 05:11, 21 March 2013 (UTC)