Jump to content

Talk:Suriname at the 2008 Summer Olympics

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleSuriname at the 2008 Summer Olympics has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 25, 2012Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Suriname at the 2008 Summer Olympics/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Rp0211 (talk · contribs) 22:32, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:


Infobox

[edit]
  • No issues

Lead

[edit]
  • No issues

Background

[edit]
  • No issues

Athletics

[edit]
  • No isssues

Swimming

[edit]
  • No issues

References

[edit]
  • Reference 2 "UF Athletics" should not be wiki-linked
  • Reference 4 "Beijing 2008" should not be italicized; "ESPN" should be wiki-linked
  • References 6, 8, 10 "Beijing 2008" should not be italicized
    • UF Athletics was not wikilinked. Also, as Beijing 2008 was italicized by default by the cite web template, I removed them altogether. ESPN has been wikilinked.

After thoroughly reviewing this article, I have decided to put it on hold at this time. I will give you the general seven days to fix these mistakes and/or address issues that you believe do not concern good article status. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask. Rp0211 (talk2me) 22:51, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome job on responding so quickly. All issues have been addressed, so I will pass the article. Keep up the good work! Rp0211 (talk2me) 22:59, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]