Talk:Table of simple cubic graphs

[Untitled]

This is a very pretty page. Thanks to the author for posting it! But there is an error in the drawings -- the eighth of the 10-vertex graphs has a pair of vertices of order 2. Should they be connected by an edge?

I think the image is correct. Vertex 3 does have the right number of edges; it's just that the edge from 3 to 2 is partially hidden behind the edge from 3 to 8. --Especially Lime (talk) 10:00, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bad links

K3,3 and Wn,2 link to some random pages! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.178.14.199 (talk) 09:59, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The K_{3,3} link makes sense (K_{3,3} is sometimes called the "utility graph" for that reason), but it should probably be a separate link for that name, with K_{3,3} itself linking to the page on complete bipartite graphs. W_{n,2} links to a different meaning of "web graph" than the intended one, but according to the source I can find (Wolfram Mathworld), the graph in question isn't a web graph at all. I'll make those changes. --Especially Lime (talk) 09:42, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

another 8 nodes cubic simple graph

I notice that may be we left a graph which not appear in list of 8 nodes. Is this next graph :

0 : 2,5
1 : 2,6
2 : 0,1,5,7
3 : 4,7
4 : 3,7
5 : 0,2
6 : 1,7
7 : 2,3,4,6

(at left are the vertices, and at right is adjacent list) I have a picture, but i am not able to send it. This graph is planar and have 2 3-cycles and one 4-cycle. greatings. Sorry, now i notice that this is not cubic. Daniel — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danjiun (talk • contribs) 00:28, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nodes 2 and 7 have 4 neighbours, so this is not a cubic graph and the graph does not belong in here. - R. J. Mathar (talk) 17:26, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Aut. Column

As far as I can tell the meaning of the "Aut." column is never explained. I assume it's number of automorphisms? Loke202 (talk) 22:15, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]