Talk:The Anti-Oedipus Papers
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
The article
[edit]Diannaa, regarding your edit here, I believe the reason you gave for returning the article to a redirect was incorrect. There is indeed an article about Anti-Oedipus, but The Anti-Oedipus Papers are a distinct topic. The article that has been started about The Anti-Oedipus Papers looks to be in pretty poor condition, however. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 05:34, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
FreeKnowledgeCreator, I am working on the edit for the page but I wanted to put information in it's place while I slowly began to increase the density of the page. I am having a few complications in understanding how to create and edit a Wikipedia page as this is my first. User:Teagengreydix (talk) 6:18 UTC, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
- That's fine. Articles do not have to be perfect when they are first started. Just be aware that major changes may be necessary to bring the article up to an acceptable level of quality. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 06:27, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
- I am trying my hardest to become accustomed to the process to best create an acceptable page. These are changes I will be making in the next few days. I am slowly becoming more used to working with this. User:Teagengreydix (talk) 7:18 UTC, 31 May 2016 (UTC)