Talk:The Beaver (newspaper)

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Newspapers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Newspapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Newspapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NewspapersWikipedia:WikiProject NewspapersTemplate:WikiProject NewspapersNewspapers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Higher education

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles

Current controversy

Currently the Beaver is again in the headlines for some rather disgusting "jokes" about how to rape women: www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2063405/LSE-students-forced-hiding-penning-joke-rape-university-newspaper.html It seems to me that the article should reflect such developments as well and not restrict itself to some promotional blurb. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.145.135.26 (talk) 09:02, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Added. 87.194.69.14 (talk) 17:59, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not a promotional piece

Needs to be made more factual rather than a promotional piece for the paper. --90.195.233.4 (talk) 01:06, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do we really need a page this size for a paper of 4,000 circulation?

Do we really need to know the editors from as far back as 1949? JAStewart 18:48, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The LSE is one of the world's most prominent universities. The Beaver is one of the most famous student newspapers in the world. It may only have a circulation of 4,000, but the LSE only has 7,000 students. Ask any former student about 'The Beaver' and they will have stories to tell - from the radical protests in the 1960's, through to the paper's most recent coverage and exposure in the national press. For better or worse, the LSE has educated Britain's (and the world's) political elite - prime ministers, MPs, heads of state - all of whom will have some memory of the paper. It's a shame that some over-zealous editors have stripped out a great deal of information from this article because of their own ignorance.

Current LSE students, soon-to-be LSE students, alumni and employers would all value the information that was removed from this page.

80.169.156.244 13:29, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Beaver issue 657.gif

Image:Beaver issue 657.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 22:10, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Beaver name.gif

Image:Beaver name.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 22:12, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Beaver. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20120720134043/http://thebeaveronline.co.uk/2009/11/23/royal-rendez-vous to http://thebeaveronline.co.uk/2009/11/23/royal-rendez-vous

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:46, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 24 June 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved, with the dab page now at The Beaver per the below discussion. (non-admin closure) Iffy★Chat -- 13:06, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Beaver → The Beaver (newspaper)
The Beaver (film) → The Beaver

– Although the 2011 film was a flop, it is the clear primary over the low-circulation student newspaper (page views). There are a huge number of other "beaver" articles, but for "The Beaver", the film is getting more than half of the total. See also The Beaver (disambiguation). – Reidgreg (talk) 13:27, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support first, oppose second redirect to dab page. In ictu oculi (talk) 19:00, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Partial support. Certainly move The Beaver → The Beaver (newspaper): the newspaper is clearly the wrong destination for the base name. Which page gets the vacated title is a judgement call. If there is a primary topic, it's the film, and moving as proposed would not be wrong. However, in view of other meanings including "the beaver" and external incoming links to the newspaper, I would move The Beaver (disambiguation) → The Beaver, leaving the film at its current title. Certes (talk) 10:47, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- As nom, I'd support the proposal by Certes. – Reidgreg (talk) 12:15, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support first, move DAB to primary per WP:NOPRIMARY. -- Netoholic @ 15:00, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
NOPRIMARY per IIO, Netoholic, and Certes. Dicklyon (talk) 14:26, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.