Talk:The City of New York vs. Homer Simpson/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions about The City of New York vs. Homer Simpson. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
They edited it!
I watched this a few weeks ago and they had edited out all references to the WTC. They didn't have Homer go to one tower, then the other, for instance.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.16.225.228 (talk • contribs)
- What affiliate was this? --Greasysteve13 08:51, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
Does anyone know if this episode will be in its original form on the DVD? I wanna know 'cause it would bug me it's altered. Zidane4028 19:23, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
- I'd love to know how this was done, seeing as the note Homer got about his car mentioned the WTC, and going to the WTC to get the car back is what drives the plot. How could they remove all WTC references without making the plot nonsensical? Unless this claim can be verified, I think the passage regarding this in the article should be removed, as it is unverified and highly unlikely.--Tiberius47 09:23, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
Usually, when this episode is edited, references to stereotypes, violence, and New York are entirely removed. I've seen this episode on Channel 4 (UK channel) and they removed the following lines:
Grampa: Once we filled the head with garbage Marge: If you only focus on the Pimps and the C.H.U.D.S (old lade in lift): Well, I certainly hope someone stabs him in the eye
And of course, the infamous "They stick all the jerks in Tower 1".
It's sad, really. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Keshidragon (talk • contribs) 07:38, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
Quotes
I don't know what's the generally accepted format for articles on TV show episodes, but I'm questioning whether it's encyclopedic to have those gigantic lists of quotes for each episode. It just strikes me more as something from a fansite than it does an encyclopedia article. And isn't this exactly what Wikiquote is for anyway? --Foot Dragoon 01:32, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
Could someone delete this
"In the final scene the Simpsons are seen driving across the Brooklyn Bridge. Which is a bridge that connects Long Island to Manhattan Island. Indicating that Springfield would be located on Long Island, which does not seem likely."
well, it seems that the ending confused someone, they were on their way out of new york to long island to the US mainland to travel back to springfield....or am i wrong here?
- They could very well be talking the bridge to Brooklyn, (which it does connect to from Manhattan, Brooklyn being part of the physical Long Island) with the intention of then taking the Verrazano Bridge then the Gothels bridge, which is a logical way to get to the U.S. mainland, especially if you are heading generally southwards. CitiCat ♫ 23:01, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
Song
What is the name of the song during the flashback?
- The Entertainer by Scott Joplin. Most commonly known from the movie The Sting CitiCat ♫ 23:04, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
Crab Juice Image
Is it just me or does this bad piece of fan made art should just be removed. It does not add anything to the article and it is of poor quality.
- Agreed. It was only added because somebody tried to create a Crab juice page, which was deleted. -- Scorpion0422 16:21, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
Crab Juice - Reply
I'm sorry, it was not "only added because somebody tried to create a Crab juice page, which was deleted". The image meets all WP:Images criteria, including:
- "relevant to article," "relative to the article's topic"
- not "overwhelming the surrounding article text"
- "origin must be properly referenced"
- "identity of the image's content"
- doesn't violate copyright
- more.
Regarding quality, it is a replica of the screen shot. (Placing the screen shot here would violate copyright law.) Please pop the episode into your DVD and pause when Homer is getting ready to drink the can. You'll see that the image is virtually identical to the animation. I suggest doing research before making comments and edits like this. Or, make your own rendering, if you can do better - that would be welcomed too.
Regarding the article, there is a tenet that every page should have at least one illustration. See for example [1] and How to Tell a Story: The Secrets of Writing Captivating Tales by Peter Rubie (ISBN 0898798094). Thank you! Gekritzl 11:45, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
Oh, and please sign your comments if you wish to be taken seriously. The first comment in this section, as unsigned, should be "stricken from the record" (if this were a court room) as it could be a sock puppet. Gekritzl 11:45, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
- So the long and short of it is that User:Scorpion0422 cited WP policy that didn't exist or did not apply, and couldn't make a cogent case for deletion of the image, yet insisted on its deletion. For instance, citing WP:NONFREE (which is NOT applicable), and mis-quoting (or making up information) from WP:SIMPSONS. Scorpion0422 even edited the copyright information on the image itself (which Scorpion0422 did NOT upload), providing false information about it. This does not seem in keeping with prudent WP editor behavior and policies. Sorry, Scorpion, just calling them like I see them. --Gekritzl 20:04, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
- I was not providing false information. A fan drawn image of a copyrighted character does not make it free... If anything it makes it a copyright violation. I was simply changing the claim to fair use. I made it screenshot because I couldn't think of what else to put it under. The reason it was deleted was because it was an orphaned fair use image. -- Scorpion0422 20:10, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
- You said for example the WP:SIMPSONS rule is to not use fan graphics on episode pages and limit it only to screenshots. This is not anywhere in that policy that I can find. Regarding the drawing - you are a proponent of screenshots, but opposed to a drawing due to copyright concerns? Of course, the whole fair use thing and interpretation of 17 U.S.C. Section 107 is still under debate. But a drawing, as a derivative work, is farther from copyright violation than is a photo or screen shot of that original work (although a pure drawing like that image surely is not eligible for registration in the Copyright Office). It is nevertheless not as infringing as a screen shot (which is the reason that image was made). If screen shots are truly allowable here, I'm all for placing the full screenshot of Homer drinking the crab juice in the article. Any objections? Thanks... --Gekritzl 20:56, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
- Look, you claimed that the image you uploaded had a free license - meaning that Wikipedia could use it wherever it wanted without worry of copyrgith violation. I simply corrected it because it was based on a copyrighted image. The reason it was deleted was because it was a non-free image that was not placed on a mainspace page, and such images are deleted. I had nothing to do with that.
- As for a screenshot, go ahead. But, why not try improving the entire article instead? Try to get the entire article to GA status instead of focusing on a minor detail? -- Scorpion0422 23:07, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
- You said for example the WP:SIMPSONS rule is to not use fan graphics on episode pages and limit it only to screenshots. This is not anywhere in that policy that I can find. Regarding the drawing - you are a proponent of screenshots, but opposed to a drawing due to copyright concerns? Of course, the whole fair use thing and interpretation of 17 U.S.C. Section 107 is still under debate. But a drawing, as a derivative work, is farther from copyright violation than is a photo or screen shot of that original work (although a pure drawing like that image surely is not eligible for registration in the Copyright Office). It is nevertheless not as infringing as a screen shot (which is the reason that image was made). If screen shots are truly allowable here, I'm all for placing the full screenshot of Homer drinking the crab juice in the article. Any objections? Thanks... --Gekritzl 20:56, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
- It is good that warriors like you and me meet in the struggle for life, and for death. Getting the article to GA status would be cool. ...by the way, shouldn't you be studying, Scorpion? :) (Okay, I should be studying too.) Take care, I'm sure we'll meet again. It has been educational and entertaining! --Gekritzl 23:39, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
- You do realize that it's summer, right? -- Scorpion0422 23:50, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
- I did forget. You have the summer off? I'm going to study some German now. (And watch the Scrubs re-run at 9:30. And play some guitar.) --Gekritzl 00:12, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
- You do realize that it's summer, right? -- Scorpion0422 23:50, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
- It is good that warriors like you and me meet in the struggle for life, and for death. Getting the article to GA status would be cool. ...by the way, shouldn't you be studying, Scorpion? :) (Okay, I should be studying too.) Take care, I'm sure we'll meet again. It has been educational and entertaining! --Gekritzl 23:39, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
OK, the original quote from this episode of The Simpsons, was: Homer, desperately hungry, sees the guy at the stall. After eating Klavkalash (spelling?) he was thirsty, and the drinks he had were " Mountain Dew or Crab Juice" and Homer looks disgusted. The joke was that he was disgusted by Mountain Dew, so he takes the Crab Juice. This is probably where the confusion came from. Keshidragon (talk) 07:44, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
Swearing?
Where does Homer mutter the MF word? Does he even do it? I've seen the episode a million times and haven't heard it.. then again I've never really listened ;P 202.126.97.233 08:22, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
- On the DVD commentary Dan Castellaneta (who voices Homer) say that Homer indeed says a swear word when he's trying to bite off the parking boot, and you can hear it if you listen closely. CitiCat ♫ 02:35, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
Duffman
Is this Duffman's first appearance? PolarisSLBM 22:11, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
Boots
I'm wondering if there's a good place in the article to put in the fact that New York City does not use "parking boots" like in the episode.[2] (I sound like Database at a question and answer period). CitiCat ♫ 23:09, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
- No. That counts as a goof, and goofs are NN. -- Scorpion0422 00:00, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
Post 9/11
german tv Pro 7 re-showed this episode just some days after the attacks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.113.21.98 (talk) 22:15, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
- Do you have a source? -- Scorpion0422 22:18, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
"Actor" in Musical
The "actor" attending Betty Ford in the musical is definitely supposed to be Charlie Sheen, not Robert Downey, Jr. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.29.140.109 (talk) 05:15, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:The Simpsons (1997).jpg
Image:The Simpsons (1997).jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 01:24, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
When's this one going to get the overhaul?
Between this one and Principal and the Pauper, I can't wait. Ribbet32 (talk) 15:15, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
- Eventually, but I think Principal and the Pauper will be done first. Gran2 15:19, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
Train ride
Dont they take a train ride and bart licks a pole for money and homer has to urinate and sees a picture of flushing meadows park? And he has a vision of the park with toilets all around a field of grass. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.83.174.109 (talk) 15:21, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
What's your point? Tithonfury (talk) 22:12, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:The Simpsons (1997).jpg
Image:The Simpsons (1997).jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 22:01, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Some more sources to use in the article
- Xihix (talk · contribs) asked me to provide some more sources for use in this article, and so I will list them here on the talk page, below. Do with them what you will. Cheers, Cirt 02:22, 3 December 2007 (UTC).
Cited sources with relevant text |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
That's all I got for now, use it well. Cheers, Cirt 03:03, 3 December 2007 (UTC). |
- Check out the Abstract for the (McNee) article. Looks quite interesting. I have added it to a Further reading section for now, as I don't have access to the article's full-text at the moment. Cirt 03:09, 3 December 2007 (UTC).
GA review
Woohoo! Fantastic clean-up. Here are my tips for improvement:
- The lead's plot synopsis could be a little long, and there is no mention of the episode's vanishing from syndication after 9/11 or its Emmy win.
- The images: I feel it'd be a lot better to show the Twin Towers in the infobox. I also feel it could do with images of the ending shot and the Emmy-winning musical scene. I'm sure you editors can easily make those images with FU rationales.
I can do a little copyediting myself and pass the article after these are done. Alientraveller (talk) 11:39, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
Done I also left a note on your talk page. xihix(talk) 22:53, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
- Excellent. But I just remembered, this episode had the first appearance of Duffman. Why is he not mentioned in the production section? Alientraveller (talk) 10:46, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
- Oh who cares, the article is GA. I've copyedited it and I am passing it. Alientraveller (talk) 21:02, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Archived peer review
- This article has had a Peer Review, which has since been archived. Please see Wikipedia:Peer review/The City of New York vs. Homer Simpson/archive1. Thank you to all who provided feedback. Cirt (talk) 05:29, 21 January 2008 (UTC).
Flushing meadows park. No mention of this when homer has to urinate? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.202.94.225 (talk) 15:52, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
reference to Secretariat?
While Homer is driving through Central Park, doesn't the carriage driver refer to his horse as Secretariat, after the race horse? TerraFrost 21:43, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
redirect?
is there any particular reason that kickin it redirects to this page? Weedthrasher (talk) 13:59, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Now a FA in Chinese Wikipedia
I have translated this article to Chinese Wikipedia here and promoted to FA status, and I want to thank User:Xihix & User:Cirt for their effort to write this amazing article. --Jarodalien (talk) 15:12, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Redirects leading here
Khlav Kalash redirects here, but this article says nothing about it. Should a sentence be added about it, or should the redirect be removed? Nukeqler (talk) 14:58, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on The City of New York vs. Homer Simpson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071214092457/http://www.offthetelly.co.uk/comedy/simpsons/decade.htm to http://www.offthetelly.co.uk/?page_id=373
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071220193309/http://www.offthetelly.co.uk/comedy/simpsons/bbc.htm to http://www.offthetelly.co.uk/?page_id=377
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:56, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
(Tall male from prior episode?)
The guy sitting behind Homer on the bus is the tall guy from "22 Short Films About Springfield". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.124.116.101 (talk) 10:16, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
- Those of us who realize that toons don't actually have any DNA are non-plussed by this bizarre claim that toon twins can be proven to exist, without getting them to sit still in adjacent seating!
--JerzyA (talk) 04:33, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
Car, sitting unknowing in New York, he just lay low.
For me, "received" -- an active verb -- implies what is grammatically termed the recipient or even, IIRC, the patient, of the action, and there's nothing grammatically wrong with that. Nevertheless, psychologically, receiving reeks too much of taking notice of, accepting, maybe even regretting or protesting the documents, when it isn't even accepting or noticing it. That grammatical convention is a vestigial metaphor whose tiny itch can be avoided, e.g. with any of a number of more explicitly passive voice, even if I haven't nailed the ideal construction or nuance. I'm not arguing for any specific verb or construction, but for more effort at crediting the car with any hint of acting, knowing, or caring. A fine point, yes, but IMO an insignificantly distracting one.
--JerzyA (talk) 10:43, 12 September 2019 (UTC)