Jump to content

Talk:The Color of Money/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 21:39, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 21:39, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Lee Vilenski: Please recheck. A lot of references are missing publication dates. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 11:31, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I think I got them all. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 11:59, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Lee Vilenski: Thanks for the update. However, #20 is now a permanent dead link. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 21:27, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I have removed the info. I'm sure we could cite to the episode of the show, but I don't think that would even cover what was said. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 08:44, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Lee Vilenski: ok, final note: I believe this article still has a lot of content that can be moved into the article about its production, including Thelma Schoonmaker's role as its editor. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 11:36, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

that is a good citation. I'll add something as soon as I can. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 13:03, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a little, about the editor, cinematographer, budget etc. from that source. Everything else is mostly quotes and hyperbole, unless you can see something additional. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 13:37, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Progress
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed