Talk:The Deliberate Stranger

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Horror Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article should be about the movie

It's very confusing for interwikis when artikles are a mix of both the book and the film--Ezzex (talk) 16:31, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why? What is confusing? There is a book called The deliberate Stranger and a movie by the same name. The title does not distinguish between the two of them. They both should be in this article. I am reverting your change until you give a reason other than confusion. Thanks, --CrohnieGal^Talk 20:49, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Split

This page seems to mostly refer to the movie. The book should either have its own separate article. – Broccoli & Coffee ^{(Oh hai)} 02:43, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support Its always a bad idea to try to cover two things in the same article.★Trekker (talk) 08:56, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – as per WP:NOPAGE, there shouldn't be two separate articles if there is not enough coverage to justify separate articles. It's likely that this article should simply be better organized, with a section on the original book first, followed by a section on the TV movie it spawned. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 14:39, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]