Talk:The Delivery Man (novel)

This article was nominated for deletion on 2008-01-14. The result of the discussion was keep.

Novels Low‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merge with Joe McGinniss Jr.

Joe McGinniss Jr. doesn't seem to have any independent notability other than this novel. JASpencer (talk) 23:30, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. Author biographies should not be merged with articles on their work. The publication of this novel satisfies basic notability for him, anyway. If you feel otherwise, feel free to AFD the biographical article. But if he isn't independently notable now and becomes so later, it will just mess up this article. Articles on a person's work must remain separate from biographical articles. 23skidoo (talk) 03:04, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. What a bad idea! This will create articles with a lack of focus and confuse readers even more between the fictional world and the real world. Also most authors have written more than one thing as has this one. Where do we find such schemes, perhaps we can send them back there. :: Kevinalewis : ^{(Talk Page)}/_(Desk) 08:44, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. The author's notability is established with the debut novel "The Delivery Man." By keeping author biographies separate from notable works it allows focused articles. There is extensive precedent in wikipedia of author biographies separated from works. Additionally, this author has published other works including short fiction and journalism pieces. Here is one work of fiction http://www.lasvegasweekly.com/content/fileadmin/oldsite/2003/10/30/feature1.html. and it appears that there are several other journalism pieces for Las Vegas Weekly. Applemartini1122 —Preceding comment was added at 18:53, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Done despite the above, as the biography was about to be deleted as expired WP:PROD, and it seemed useful to have enough info here to distinguish the author from his father. – Fayenatic London 11:43, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on The Delivery Man (novel). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:59, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links

There are six entries in the "External links". Three seems to be an acceptable number and of course, everyone has their favorite to add for four. The problem is that none is needed for article promotion.

ELpoints #3) states: Links in the "External links" section should be kept to a minimum. A lack of external links or a small number of external links is not a reason to add external links.
LINKFARM states: There is nothing wrong with adding one or more useful content-relevant links to the external links section of an article; however, excessive lists can dwarf articles and detract from the purpose of Wikipedia. On articles about topics with many fansites, for example, including a link to one major fansite may be appropriate.
WP:ELMIN: Minimize the number of links.
WP:ELCITE: ...access dates are not appropriate in the external links section. Do not use {{cite web}} or other citation templates in the External links section. Citation templates are permitted in the Further reading section. -- Otr500 (talk) 22:20, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]