Jump to content

Talk:The Honor of the Family

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:The Honor of the Family/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Good888 (talk · contribs) 20:16, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Going to take a look at this lost film article. The review should be up soon. good888 (talk) 20:16, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lead section

  • Note that the film is now lost.

Plot

  • Link Moving Picture News. I know it's a red link but still.

Cast

  • I have noticed you don't have this section in this article. May I ask why?

Reception and legacy

  • Link Moving Picture World.
  • Link Universal.

References

  • Link the publishers of these sources if possible.

Going to place on hold for now. I will promote once the issues above are addressed. good888 (talk) 12:26, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Good888: all fixed. The reason there was no cast or directorial credits is because it was not listed and I could not find anything. I'll double check Braff's text when I get it, but I got nothing on it. Early Rex films are extremely difficult to dig up that kind of information on - even the company is a red link still. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 15:33, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@ChrisGualtieri: I am going to wait until you check Braff's text again, just to make sure that there is no surviving cast. If there is none, then I would suggest making a section stating that no cast survived and that Lon Chaney was claimed to be in this film. good888 (talk) 10:35, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Good888: It has nothing - I just double checked. Braff's text is culled from much of the sources that I have access to, but that also means that if Braff did not find it - I certainly won't. The production details were not published and apparently do not exist or cannot be found. Braff made three attempts to access the silent film records and Universal could not provide them.... which ultimately means this might be all that can be verified. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 21:13, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]