Jump to content

Talk:The Implant

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair use rationale for Image:Sein ep418.jpg

[edit]

Image:Sein ep418.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:40, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

and they're spectacular

[edit]

Why does it state 'citation needed' when in the references and external links a link to the full script is included? Blonkm (talk) 16:20, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Double Dipping

[edit]

don't delete. the main Seinfeld page has eight (8) entries under Catchphrases and 7/8 episode article talks about the catchphrase in the opening paragraph except this one - of course it should be mentioned and prominently.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Thehornet (talkcontribs) 13:08, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is a blog post and also a primary source. Maybe you find a secondary, reliable source discussing it, that could be worth mentioning. But singling out a single blog post form Harvard and in the lead? No. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 20:03, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]