Talk:The Priory Academy LSST
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
refs...spelling, reword. WelcomeVictuallers 14:22, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
Edits
[edit]I'm not convinced the article is written from a NPOV, and I removed the contact numbers as I felt this was too close to advertising...
EvocativeIntrigue 15:02, 10 May 2006 (UTC) hello im mr man
I finally got round to wikifying this after an IP user reminded me- it still needs a lot of work, but I think I've managed to remove any POV comments and wild, unsubstantiated claims. One thing I had difficulty locating was the size of the school, but other than that I'm not sure there's much more that could be added other than a photograph.
EvocativeIntrigue 19:51, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
This article need the history of the school. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.0.195.125 (talk • contribs).
Buildings
[edit]There's a new RE block being built, so the Pavilion can be used just for PE. Going past the RE block everyday, it looks close to being finished, should this be put in yet? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.150.119.113 (talk) 21:56, 12 March 2007 (UTC).
Academy Plans
[edit]Anyone living around lincoln has probably heard the propaganda :P about the academy project.. should a section be added about it? Difficult to do without having too much of a POV - very little opposing/neutral material going around about it
I would add some, but this damn school gives me too much work..... :( lol
Oh and because theres so many of us priory haters going around ;), watch out for vandalism... although the school IP is blocked on wiki thank god, we were some of the biggest vandals out there :) lol Arghlookamonkey 22:06, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
Recent edits
[edit]Someone has made widespread changes to the page and the vast majority of the new information is incorrect. The headmasters name, schools webpage, ofsted results, gcse results and several other things have been vandalized. I can't be bothered to change it but i thought i would mention it. 31/01/08
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.152.36.76 (talk • contribs) 19:18, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
- I have reverted most of the last couple of days edits to what I think is a good version. Keith D (talk) 20:19, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
Expansion of article
[edit]Since I go to the school, I figured I should try and expand the article a bit. I've noticed a few wrong pieces of information, so I'll try and fix it. I think some of the wrong info in the page at the moment is not intential, but just a result of mis-information. Also, I'll try and stop some of the vandalism that's appeared and to get a photo if I'm allowed a camera in school. Damian805 (talk) 19:30, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
Web site
[edit]The web site for the school appears to have been password protected. Is there a publicly accessible site available for the school? Keith D (talk) 17:47, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
NPOV
[edit]There does not seem to be an NPOV with this article. A couple of users are removing points and references that may be seen to be negative. However I believe should stay as they are observations and points of view of the community of lincoln as reported by its main news paper Lincolnshire Echo (thisislincolnshire). Also most references provided link to the school's main website is this as bad as posting phone numbers as someone else pointed out? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mattboothman (talk • contribs) 01:40, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
- The "observations and points of view of the community of lincoln" are not necessarily encyclopediac material, even if they are reported in what may (or may not) be a reliable source.
- The school's own website is not an independent source, and therefore the article should not rely primarily on it for information. Instead, try to include more information that can be backed up by independent reliable sources.
- I'm not sure what phone numbers have to do with it. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 01:42, 28 April 2012 (UTC)