Talk:Thomas Winning

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Christianity: Catholicism Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Catholic Church portal This article is supported by WikiProject Catholicism (assessed as Low-importance).

Scotland Low‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Page Move

Before moving the article again, please read Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Western clergy). Thanks. Gentgeen 22:09, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Before moving this article again please read the top of the official policy on WP:NAME. Generally, article naming should give priority to what the majority of English speakers would most easily recognize, with a reasonable minimum of ambiguity, while at the same time making linking to those articles easy and second nature. Another way to summarize the overall principle of Wikipedia's naming conventions: Names of Wikipedia articles should be optimized for readers over editors; and for a general audience over specialists.

See, here's the thing. No-one outside specialists ever referred to Tom Winning as 'Thomas Cardinal Winning'. He is invariable known as Tom Winning, Cardinal Winning, or Thomas Winning

Google "Thomas Cardinal Winning" = 48 hits (NOT impressive) [1]
Google "'Thomas Winning' and Cardinal" = 9,450 [2]
Google "Cardinal Winning" = 17,200 [3]
BBC obituary 'Cardinal Thomas Winning' [4]
His own Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Glasgow 'Thomas Joseph Winning' or 'Cardinal Winning' [5]

I'd say that's pretty conclusive. Your western clergy guideline is obviously not in conformity with policy - perhaps you should update it?. --Doc 23:09, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

His Eminence

Do we need to put the title "His Eminence" before every bishop's name on Wikipedia? Catholics may choose to do so, but this doesn't sound very secular/encyclopedic to me. Allowing this practice seems a bit like allowing Muslims to put the phrase "Peace be upon him" after every mention of a prophet. -- Big Brother 1984 18:21, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

'Eminence' is a title for cardinals only. Ulysses54 13:34, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Winning was a Cardinal! 79.73.26.171 (talk) 01:39, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed it is unneccessary.--Doc^g 13:42, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Thomas Winning. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060326144622/http://heritage.scotsman.com/profiles.cfm?cid=1&id=39552005 to http://heritage.scotsman.com/profiles.cfm?cid=1&id=39552005

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:37, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Thomas Winning. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110605174208/http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/nmCentre/news/news-01/pa01-043.htm to http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/nmCentre/news/news-01/pa01-043.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:20, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]