Jump to content

Talk:Timeline of Arizona

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merge with History of Arizona

[edit]
  • Oppose - I think that timeline and history articles serve different purposes, and both fulfill different objects. This timeline is too lengthy to include in the article.Onel5969 TT me 13:37, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Timeline of Arizona. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:48, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal

[edit]

There's an August merge proposal from User:M2545, to merge Timeline of Arizona to here. While they haven't started a discussion or made a case (see WP:MERGING) or done it boldly (see WP:MERGEPROP), it seems from their edit summaries that they are arguing for WP:OVERLAP. It's hard to disagree with this! I therefore support the current proposal (noting the contrary 2015 view from another editor). Klbrain (talk) 08:34, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]