Talk:Tizer

Food and drink: Beverages Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Related taskforces:
/
	This article is within the scope of the Beverages Task Force, a task force which is currently considered to be inactive.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Scotland Low‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

New Flavour

I think the flavor deserves a mention.

Added a short description. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 212.146.47.250 (talk • contribs) 21:19, 1 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

I can't see this new "rebranded" flavour lasting too long. It's just tastes like a very poor, watery supermarket value fruit drink now. At the very least it tastes nothing like Tizer. Bad move Barr. 86.2.126.106 16:29, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's disgusting now with the non-artificial flavouring. Has anyone else took a little time out to e-mail complaints to them about this new homemade rust coloured fruit drink? I have, the more they receive, the better. Plus something needs to be written in the article - I'm sure you'll find a website to cite sources that people are hating this new 'healthy' garbage drink. 86.139.69.99 (talk) 00:43, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

1990s Tizer TV Adverts

Does anyone have more information about the 1990s Tizer adverts on the TV?

User:Lagichinna 20:33PM, 13/06/07

New taste

This latest change does mean the article needs re-writing though!

I'd also be interested to see the original original rec. from 1924 and at several points inbetween... someone must have old packaging etc... (although maybe back in 1924 it wasnt common or required to list ingredients in the same way it is today).

Either way, I dont think the articles should describe the current drink as 'very sweet' - thats one thing its definately NOT anymore. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.171.129.72 (talk) 12:01, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]