Talk:Tom Banks (EastEnders)

This page was proposed for deletion by Magioladitis (talk · contribs) on 3 August 2009 with the comment:
Minor character, Appeared only for some months in a long-running soap opera. Articles has no referenced and/or real world information.
It was contested by Gungadin (talk · contribs) on 3 August 2009

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

EastEnders

This article is within the scope of WikiProject EastEnders, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the popular BBC soap opera EastEnders on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EastEndersWikipedia:WikiProject EastEndersTemplate:WikiProject EastEndersEastEnders articles

Tasks for WikiProject EastEnders:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Expand : All articles listed in Category:Stub-Class EastEnders articles and Category:EastEnders articles in need of real-world perspective
Other :
- Improve to FA standard: EastEnders: E20
- Improve to GA standard: EastEnders
- Maintain: List of EastEnders characters (2023), List of EastEnders characters, List of former EastEnders characters, List of awards and nominations received by EastEnders
- Get involved in the Wikipedia EastEnders Project.

Soap Operas

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soap Operas, an effort to build consistent guidelines for and improve articles about soap operas and telenovelas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit WikiProject Soap Operas, where you can join the project and/or the discussion.Soap OperasWikipedia:WikiProject Soap OperasTemplate:WikiProject Soap Operassoap opera articles

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Merge?

I think this one can be a lot more than plot due to several high profile storylines, especially his death. Definitely some decent interviews that can be included. Question is, should we build upon this in minors or allow to have own article? Either way, i'm going to remove PROD, because it shouldnt be deleted just redirected to a list in worst case scenario.GunGagdin ^Moan 23:44, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say it depends on how much information we can find to expand with - if it's quite short, send it to the list, if it's quite long, keep it here! AnemoneProjectors (talk) 23:59, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article can't stand alone. There are no references, no real world information and it's about a short-lived character in a long-running soap. I suggest that we delete it and we add some information about the character in one of these list of characters. -- Magioladitis (talk) 07:44, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think the character is notable. Doesnt really matter how long he appeared, it's notability that counts and the character was discussed a lot in the media at the time due to a high profile exit. We're getting around to cleaning all these characters up, it's just taking time. Let us look for sources over the next few days and if we dont come up with anything, then we will merge and it can redirected, not deleted. That OK?GunGagdin^Moan 13:01, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK. That sounds good. -- Magioladitis (talk) 13:38, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, done a fair bit, possibly more can be added. I think it can stand alone now. Thoughts? GunGagdin^Moan 17:59, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]