Talk:Tom Sloan (footballer, born 1900)
Appearance
Tom Sloan (footballer, born 1900) has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: January 13, 2021. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Tom Sloan (footballer, born 1900)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 16:05, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
Comments
- Linfield is overlinked in the lead.
- Consider linking Captain (association football).
- Also player-manager.
- Might be worth linking British Army (if, indeed, that was the Army he joined)?
- Jimmy?". don't think you need that full stop.
- Link "suspended" appropriately, we don't want readers thinking they found him in the air on ropes...
- Link "transfer" appropriately.
- Is there a suitable link for "reserve"?
- " club's FA Cup run," could link the specific FA Cup.
- List of Welsh Cup finals is a possible target for the Welsh Cup final.
- Link "cap".
- Glentoran overlinked.
- "club to the final of the City Cup where they were defeated." by whom?
That's all I have, a nice article. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 11:52, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
- @The Rambling Man: Thanks for taking a look, I've addressed all of the points above. Kosack (talk) 13:07, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
- No worries, all looks good, but just one last thing, what makes nifootball.com a RS? The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 15:21, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
- The site has been discussed a few times and is generally seen as a RS, see a few topics 1, 2 and the big one where it went up at the sources noticeboard. The site has a pretty sizeable list of established football historians as contributors I believe based on past discussions. Kosack (talk) 16:03, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
- Great, good to know, thanks for the background. Happy to see this one pass. Good work. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 20:32, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
- The site has been discussed a few times and is generally seen as a RS, see a few topics 1, 2 and the big one where it went up at the sources noticeboard. The site has a pretty sizeable list of established football historians as contributors I believe based on past discussions. Kosack (talk) 16:03, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
- No worries, all looks good, but just one last thing, what makes nifootball.com a RS? The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 15:21, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Sports and recreation good articles
- GA-Class biography articles
- GA-Class biography (politics and government) articles
- Low-importance biography (politics and government) articles
- Politics and government work group articles
- GA-Class biography (sports and games) articles
- Low-importance biography (sports and games) articles
- Sports and games work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- GA-Class football articles
- Mid-importance football articles
- GA-Class football in Wales articles
- Mid-importance football in Wales articles
- Football in Wales task force articles
- WikiProject Football articles
- GA-Class Ireland articles
- Low-importance Ireland articles
- GA-Class Ireland articles of Low-importance
- All WikiProject Ireland pages
- GA-Class Northern Ireland-related articles
- Low-importance Northern Ireland-related articles
- All WikiProject Northern Ireland pages