Talk:Trance (2013 film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the British cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the French cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Kent Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kent, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the county of Kent in South East England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KentWikipedia:WikiProject KentTemplate:WikiProject KentKent-related articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Kent tasks:

Here are some Kent related tasks you can do:

Clean up an article: Here are automatically generated lists of articles needing cleanup sorted alphabetically and by category.
Edit the Top and High importance articles.
Refine/polish: Ashford, Royal Tunbridge Wells, Canterbury
Expand:: List of churches in Kent, Maidstone Borough Council
NPOV: K College
Citation needed: Unreferenced Kent articles
Cleanup/Copyedit: Kingdom of Kent
Expert attention: Channel Tunnel, Bromley Civic Society
Stubs: see Kent geography stubs articles

Note: These articles may overlap with those on other related lists. If you would like to make a change, either do so yourself, or make a suggestion.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Budget

Box Office Mojo does not list a budget. Where does the listed £13 million come from? It is probably accurate, early sources said "around £15 million" and various other sources have a vague mention of about the same budget as Boyle usually gets. -- 109.76.151.247 (talk) 00:24, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Synopsis

The synopsis of the plot is garbled and inaccurate — Preceding unsigned comment added by AndriesduToit (talk • contribs) 10:38, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

About the plot...

204.38.52.66 (talk) The movie uses flash forward and back effectively, but my assessment is that the therapist is deceptively beguiling even more so because she comes off as honest. Simon is indicted as violent, the one example outside of hypnosis is when he yells strongly at someone in the street at the beginning of the movie. Perhaps this supports the therapists claim that he was violent toward their relationship which she started (!) but I think not. Frank is more knowledgeable and rightly suspicious of her motives. She asks when in bed together to 'tell him something' and he (lucky guy) says: I think not. She had ended the relationship with Simon with hypnotic suggestions he forget her but also included the command BRING IT TO ME which Simon read when staggering out of the art building with his head injury just in time to be hit by a car. The last thing he sees before the hit is the therapists face on the cel phone. The driver of the car becomes to Simon the therapist who he remembers commanded him to forget her. His anger leads him to choke this innocent driver to death. He hides her body in the trunk of her car and leaves it in an undergound car park after which he collapses and is hospitalized. On his release he remembers nothing. The therapist is responsible for the death of this car driver, the others shot by Simon (who had never used a gun the movie makes clear) and one is left wondering how much of Simon's violence is real and how much stoked by this therapist. One wonders if the theft of the painting is not actually an idea inspired by her and not Frank, especially as Frank tells Simon in one scene that he was the mastermind behind the robbery. If it was his idea was it really his? The therapists seems to revel in her explicit honesty; she tells Simon when they have all gone to the car park and recovered the painting from the trunk with the dead girl all of their relationship emphasizing his violence. Up to this point she had no knowledge of the car accident and the resulting dead girl and even tho appearing shocked at the dead girl she later makes totally evident her lack of empathy when she send Frank a tablet with a video of her and the stolen painting. She beguilingly offers Frank the choice of remembering or no. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.38.52.66 (talk) 21:33, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Poltimore

There seems to be a dispute around linking Mark Poltimore to the article Baron Poltimore. I have changed this to "Mark Poltimore (7th [[Baron Poltimore])", which avoids ambiguity and fixes the stated problem that the article is not about Mark Poltimore specifically. Guy (Help!) 12:58, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, a good compromise. I did add a the citation is needed that they are the same person.AbramTerger (talk) 13:10, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I added a citation.AbramTerger (talk) 13:25, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

repeated undo of link to nothing

For the second time I have undone an edit, by an IP User, that posted a link to a non-existent article. Such a link put the name of an individual in red in the article. Perhaps the edit was merely a mistake by its editor, or perhaps it was a deliberate attempt at promotion. Either way, or whatever the reason, the edit should not be repeated.Chjoaygame (talk) 22:29, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

hunching at the bit

James says: "I was hunching at the bit, as we say in Scotland... It just means I was desperate...I was hungry to play this part. This is impossible, this must be a mis-quote by the interviewer. I can find no use of this idiom in Scotland, or even Scottish usage of "hunch" in this way. It has to be "chomping at the bit".

http://www.npr.org/2013/03/30/175709286/why-actor-james-mcavoy-almost-turned-down-trance

BeckenhamBear (talk) 12:00, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have exhaustively researched this and can find no use of this idiom in Scotland, or even Scottish usage of "hunch" in this way. Or the rest of the world even. I have come to the conclusion that what James must have said was "champing at the bit", rather than the sometimes used chomping. As its' not an encyclopaedias job to broadcast mistakes like this I've quietly deleted it.BeckenhamBear (talk) 14:05, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, it's evidently a thing (2010):

"...All we needed now was a couple of thugs hunching at the bit to make a scene..."

Silenced - Chapter Nine Author: czobermeier Word count: 1637 Views: 15 Submission date 23/06/2010 2:43:10 AM

http://www.webook.com/submission.aspx?p=66dae7cc473f424890e5035bbd23d6d8&st=653bb144422d4ac79ccd1544a5f49ffb JohndanR (talk) 06:09, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]