Talk:Tropical Storm Tammy (2005)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
I will be reviewing this article currently up for Good article nomination. The full review will be up within an hour or two. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 16:35, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

1. Well Written

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   "Tropical Storm Tammy was a moderate strength but short lived tropical storm during..." –The wording could be a little better, but otherwise no other things I can see.

2. Factually Accurate

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

3. Neutral point of view.

   Fair representation without bias:

4. Stability

   No edit wars etc.:

5. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

6. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Besides the first sentence, everything looks good. Just leave a comment here when the sentence has been fixed :-) Cyclonebiskit (talk) 16:55, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

Great! I'm passing this article now, good job on it. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 17:26, 5 October 2008 (UTC)