Talk:Tropical Storm Tammy (2005)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
I will be reviewing this article currently up for Good article nomination. The full review will be up within an hour or two. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 16:35, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
- Well Written
- a (prose):
b (MoS):
- "Tropical Storm Tammy was a moderate strength but short lived tropical storm during..." –The wording could be a little better, but otherwise no other things I can see.
- a (prose):
- Factually Accurate
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (references):
- Neutral point of view.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Stability
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Besides the first sentence, everything looks good. Just leave a comment here when the sentence has been fixed :-) Cyclonebiskit (talk) 16:55, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
- Great! I'm passing this article now, good job on it. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 17:26, 5 October 2008 (UTC)