Jump to content

Talk:Tropical cyclone scales/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
I will review the article, since I started the process anyway within the talk page. The article fails articles 1, 2, and 6 of GA criteria.

  • The article 1 failure is the line of the lead that states "there are alternative cyclone scales." If so, dedicate a small section at the end, describing each one in a sentence, since there should be no unique information within the lead per the manual of style (it is meant to be a summary.) I will allow the continuation of the red link within the article, but as a head's up, this article will not pass FAC unless the redlinked article is created.
    • Which Scales should we place in this Paragraph? HSI? JTWC?Jason Rees (talk) 17:57, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      • Here's the list: ACE, the Emanuel version of ACE with cubed results rather than squared, HSI, Hurricane Hazard Index, and IKE. You can even add a line about the proposed rainfall scale from 1973, mentioning that it was never used. If any of us think of more in the future after the GA passage, we'll add a line about them with the appropriate referencing. BTW...this paragraph could be thrown into the red wikilink as it will likely make a reasonable lead for that article. Thegreatdr (talk) 23:36, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • The article 2 failure concerns the references. Not all the references have publishing years. This needs to be rectified.

I will place this article on hold for a week so you can deal with the issues. Otherwise, thank you for tackling the improvement of this article. Thegreatdr (talk) 20:40, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Updated review

[edit]

You've added the asked-for section about the other scales. It needs to be copyedited and also needs inline references. After this is done, I will pass the article. Five more days remaining. Thegreatdr (talk) 20:01, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]