Talk:Trpinja

Croatia Low‑importance

	Croatia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Croatia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Croatia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CroatiaWikipedia:WikiProject CroatiaTemplate:WikiProject CroatiaCroatia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Villages (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Villages, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.VillagesWikipedia:WikiProject VillagesTemplate:WikiProject VillagesVillages articles

Serbian Cyrillic alphabet in lead section

I think it is legitimate to mention alternate official name and spelling of Trpinja in Serbian Cyrillic alphabet in this article lead section. I think it is comparable with conversation that was held on Vukovar talk page Talk:Vukovar#Transplanted discussion from WP:Croatia talk page with difference that in case of Trpinja there is no any controversy with local government. Even local Statut Općine Trpinja deals with language and script issue in articles 54, 55 and 56. Also, I think user IvanOS should stop his long lasting edit war over this issue and rise his objections and arguments on this article talk page or WP:Croatia project page.--MirkoS18 (talk) 15:58, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

89.75% Serb population points that Serbian should be in the introduction.--Zoupan 17:16, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

IMO wherever the law states Cyrillic could be used on account of population figures (all municipalities and town with at least 1/3 of minority population), we should have it in lede. Timbouctou (talk) 17:30, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Trpinja. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:55, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Trpinja. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120220112604/http://www.eparhija-osjeckopoljskabaranjska.hr/CMS/0089/Default.aspx?EID=22759 to http://www.eparhija-osjeckopoljskabaranjska.hr/CMS/0089/Default.aspx?EID=22759

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:22, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]