Jump to content

Talk:Truthdig

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

description

[edit]

Seriously? "Progressive"? This page drastically mischaracterizes the website, its radical, it has a reputation for borderline extremism. I know political Wikipedia articles are babied by their biased protectors, but this is just plain misleading.

True- — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1005:B15F:9C14:19AC:8C0E:D2B9:760 (talk) 22:59, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


This commenter is confused about the term progressive. I offer a possible explanation and an example. The term progressive is used and misused to the extent its meaning is as vague as fascism.

The commenter appears to have a problem with the description of the website in terms of whether (in his mind) the website is accurately described as radical or extremist. That said, I tend to agree with the poster that this page drastically mischaraterizes the website. Far from being radical or extremist, Truthdig is better described as a propaganda system that is concerned with typical details like audience size but also actively suppresses critical thinking. Contributions are typically from authors who are known to have worked with or for intelligence services with specific training in communication and propaganda. Note that this doesn't immediately imply some kind of nefarious purpose, but at least suggests an aggressive effort to influence and suppress or destroy dissent.

I offer this set of basically unestablished opinion with the hope that discriminating readers take with a grain of salt. I recommend the same course of action when reading Truthdig or (of course) visiting Wikipedia to get an idea of what the website is "all about." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.33.77.150 (talk) 13:34, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

blog

[edit]

It's not really a blog -- it's an online magazine. It has an editor, regular and freelance contributors, and publishes much of its content in article form. It does have several blogs within it, but I think it's miscategorized. Nep 20:45, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Nep. Truthdig is not a blog.--AdeleivdVelden (talk) 20:26, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with both of the above - it is not a blog. Meh33 (talk) 05:41, 1 April 2010 (UTC)meh33[reply]

Follow the Money

[edit]

interesting article and also as far as I have read some articles a interesting news-site but... no word where the money came from. Who pays the site, the costs, the bilts etc. Is this a free hobby from journalists just for fun or do they earn money with it? -- Hartmann Schedel cheers 02:03, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This might answer your question. Truthdig has been identified by the PropOrNot propaganda identification service as repeating, echoing, or referring their audience to Russian propaganda. Woood (talk) 10:51, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

USC Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism as a source

[edit]

I've removed a reference to the USC Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism (DeMos 2011-05-06) as a source. It did not support the claim for which it was cited; I've marked that claim as {{cn}} pending discovery of better sources. But, more fundamentally, the USC Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism has too close a connection with Truthdig, through both founders, to be acceptable as a source for this Wikipedia article. Kaufman did her master's there; Scheer is a professor. Publications from Annenberg about Truthdig must be treated essentially as PR. It's not a matter of source reliability—Annenberg is highly respected—but of source independence.

Syrenka V (talk) 04:28, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Source independence?" Assuming you are not incorrect in implying that that is a Wikipedia guideline, are we to mechanically try to follow imagined rules, —or; are we to seek a representative description of reality? I believe the answer is; Wiki has guidelines, NOT rules. Guess why? (That's intentional, and this is a perfect example of why.) Since Annenberg is indeed highly respected school of journalism, that seems to hugely devalue your suggestion of reported bias. There may be a case there, but you have not made it. Please explain your reasoning, if any. Cheers!
--2602:306:CFCE:1EE0:3044:A2C3:2683:987B (talk) 20:54, 3 September 2018 (UTC)Doug Bashford[reply]

Citation to Webby Awards site

[edit]

I've introduced a number of citations directly to the Webby Awards site, to document and clarify the claim that Truthdig has won six Webbys. The use of an awards site to document the awards it has given is of course WP:PRIMARY sourcing, and may thus seem counterproductive in the effort to reduce use of primary sources, but it's exclusively for the awards given, and for that purpose there is no more reliable or definitive source. Incidentally, mere arithmetic to count the number of awards (and of each type of award) does not count as original research (see WP:CALC within WP:NOR).

Syrenka V (talk) 04:38, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Awards from Los Angeles Press Club

[edit]

I'm finding it difficult to source the precise claim that Truthdig has won 22 awards from the Los Angeles Press Club, so I've replaced it with the claim that it has won "numerous" awards, including 11 awards in 2017 alone, sourced directly to the Los Angeles Press Club (similar considerations apply as for direct citations to the Webby Awards site, discussed above). This is without prejudice to restoration of the 22-award claim if it can be sourced.

Syrenka V (talk) 22:08, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

some problems

[edit]

Much of the section on origin is puffery, particularly the 2nd paragraph The list of non notable contributors is inappropriate content, resembling a news release (that's the nearest availble tag). The overal tone is praise of the publication. DGG ( talk ) 18:43, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I do not believe any of these tags were justified, and for the reasons stated below, I have removed all of them.
The majority of the contributors listed are notable. Accordingly, I have linked their names to their Wikipedia articles, and removed the "news release" tag, which was based on a false assumption. Also: notable or not, a list of frequent contributors is encyclopedic information about any publication.
Supporting a charge of NPOV requires more than just exhibiting a positive end result. Neutrality under WP:NPOV is fundamentally a question of whether the article reflects the balance of information in the sources. Please do not retag this article with {{NPOV}} unless you have evidence that well-sourced negative information has been systematically omitted—not just that positive information has been included. If you do have such evidence, please at least give some indication of what it is.
While some of the language used may sound laudatory, it would be difficult to tone down the positive language without distorting the factual account. For example: asserting "high journalistic standards" is a factual claim, not empty praise, and is supported by the sources; removing it, or even toning it down, would be a distortion of the facts. Similarly for the assertion that Kaufman took a strategic chance on longreads. I have accordingly also removed the "peacock terms" tag.
Syrenka V (talk) 14:38, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I'm adding back the tag. Truthdig is a known Russian propaganda site that is linked to at a very high rate by, for example, Trollbot twitter accounts. The Wikipedia page currently reads like a puff piece for this site. Woood (talk) 11:20, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Contributors

[edit]

The last two paragraphs of that section don't seem to fit the section title, nor the tenor of the overall article. Perhaps they would better fit in a new section called: Heart Tug Articles. Cheers!
--2602:306:CFCE:1EE0:3044:A2C3:2683:987B (talk) 21:07, 3 September 2018 (UTC)Doug Bashford[reply]

Who is Zuade Kaufman?

[edit]

There's no Wikipedia page on this individual and little is known about her. Incidentally, many people know Chris Hedges because of his articles on Truthdig and many other outlets, but we really don't know too much about his background either other than basic facts about education, credentials and some family details. If we knew more about Zuade Kaufman perhaps we'd know more about Truthdig and Chris Hedges. Hedge's affiliation with the CIA is at best a guess. Which reminds me, clearly Truthdig has changed over time (every second in some sense) so how can the wikipedia page be accurate?

Some kind of dispute allegedly between Kaufman and Scheer and the "staff"

[edit]

The headline summarizes what this contributor knows from open letters from the website itself. Some of the "staff" (Chris Hedges, Kasia Anderson, Jacob Sugarman, Natasha Hakimi Zapata, Eunice Wong, Ilana Novick, Mr. Fish, Paul Street and Lee Camp) apparently decided to stop work because of work related grievances. Their letter was published then removed from the Truthdig website. Curiously the letter explains that their intent is not to harm "Truthdig" and asks among other things for "annual performance reviews" a corporate tool known for abusing workers. Note that this request is coming from authors who have vaguely intimated that "the people should rise up" or "don't wait until it's too late" or more accurately "resist something!" In Kaufman's 3/17 letter she writes she is "breaking her silence" and implies that Sheer (co-owner/probably former CIA) might have done something along the lines of the #MeToo. This isn't specifically stated. However, much of the media has been heavily distributing propaganda based on ideas of state authoritarianism to counter human sexuality by avoiding the real issues of human sexuality.

None of the recent drama (3/2020) on Truthdig has any verifiability. The website claims to cover topics that are outside the coverage provided by mainstream media and with a "progressive point of view". The numbers of readers would otherwise make Truthdig a part of the ambigious description: main stream media. Propaganda that supports miliaritism hardly qualifies as progresssive. Finally, their is little to no information on Truthdig that will empower anyone for purposes past the readers' own perspectives on reality. The website's primary purpose is distribution of propaganda with surveillance, censorship and last but not least for profit or income.

Scheer makes a new website

[edit]

All the CIA regulars are back on Scheer's new website. Empty op-eds that question militarism are written by members (retired) of the military who supported or fought in every recent US war. The propaganda model is the same payload of potentially emotional effects in simplified, easy to understand prose. This same formula that obscures complexity to prevent tiring readers and inhibits any "dangerous" new knowledge or understanding. Readers who are fooled are more susceptible to emotional responses that inhibit cognitive resistance to the daily lessons of acceptable views and permitted ideas delivered by the content.


So this means the end of TruthDig as it was - assuming "irreconcilable" is an accurate description of the previous exit of the usual suspects. We need the article to link to a new article dedicated to Scheer's new website Sheerpost. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.153.126.252 (talk) 21:09, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Origins(?)

[edit]

The section titled Origins is more a biography of Zuade Kaufman than any origin of TruthDig. 173.224.18.193 (talk) 19:31, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September conflict-of-interest update proposal

[edit]

I’m an administrative assistant for Truthdig. Truthdig is an alternative news website that provides a mix of long-form articles, blog items, curated links, interviews, arts criticism, and commentary on current events that is delivered from a politically progressive, left-leaning point of view. I’ve noticed that the article on Truthdig is largely out of date, with the majority of its content having been added in 2017.

I would like to edit the article to add updates and improve clarity. Given my role, I can provide accurate and current information to enhance the article's relevance and accuracy. I’ve also provided reputable sources for all the key information.

I’m relatively new to Wikipedia, so would like an editor to review and add these proposed edits, or let me know if I’m approved to add them.

Here are the proposed edits below, along with their sources:

Truthdig description

[edit]

Truthdig was co-founded in 2005 by Add:”Publisher” Zuade Kaufman and Robert Scheer, who served as editor-in-chief.[1]

Replace: with “As of March 2021, Kaufman serves as sole owner of the website.” [2]


Origins

[edit]

The section below is rewritten for clarity.

Kaufman began her journalism career at KCET in Los Angeles, initially working on documentaries before transitioning to print journalism. She collaborated with Scheer on hyperlocal editions at the Los Angeles Times , Westside, Weekly, and Our Times, starting as a researcher and then a full-time staff reporter. After the newspaper changed ownership and eliminated these local editions, Kaufman pursued a master's degree in journalism at the University of Southern California Annenberg School for Communications.[3][4] She began developing Truthdig while at USC, and it launched immediately after Scheer was fired from the Los Angeles Times.[5]


Contributors

[edit]

The section below is expanded with updates.

Significant contributors to Truthdig have included Noam Chomsky, Juan Cole, animator Mark Fiore, Amy Goodman, Sam Harris, Chris Hedges, Greg Palast, Carrie Rickey,Gore Vidal,

Add: William Blum,Émile P. Torres, and Kamin Mohammadi.


Delete: “660-word essay”

Add: “While developing their Dig Series “Eugenics in the Twenty-First Century: New Names, Old Ideas,” Dr. Émile P. Torres first coined, with Dr. Timnit Gebru, the acronym TESCREAL (Transhumanism, Extropianism, Singularitarianism, Cosmism, Rationalism, Effective Altruism, and Longtermism) to describe the “bundle” of ideologies characterizing Artificial General Intelligence(AGI)-centric worldviews influencing technological and ethical discourse.”[6][7]


Work stoppage in 2020

[edit]

Proposed edit for accuracy:


On March 11, 2020, replace “nine employees” with “six employees and three contractors” of Truthdig signed a statement announcing a work stoppage to protest what they described as "unfair labor conditions and the effort by the publisher, Zuade Kaufman, to remove the site's founding Editor-in-Chief and co-owner Robert Scheer".[8][9]


Relaunch in 2022

[edit]

The section below is expanded with updates.


Replace “On November 1, 2022, the website relaunched without Scheer's involvement.” With “On November 1, 2022, Truthdig relaunched under the leadership of its original founder and publisher, Zuade Kaufman. The relaunch included a website redesign to better display their flagship "Digs," a multi-month investigative series focused on curated topics by investigative reporters with expertise in the subject matter.[10] Included in the "Digs" series is "The Persecution of Julian Assange," featuring a comprehensive timeline, original reporting, and commentary on Assange's exile and the broader implications for whistleblowers and press freedom.[11]


In 2023, Truthdig journalist Justin Noble exposed Fairmont Brine Processing, a radioactive waste facility in Marion County, West Virginia, that released radioactivity into the environment. The investigation, along with the follow-up Truthdig article "A Slow Rolling Disaster in Fracking Country," revealed serious health impacts on the community and prompted EPA investigations.[12][13]


Truthdig also relaunched Global Voices: Truthdig Women Reporting, an initiative that publishes articles by female correspondents worldwide reporting from their native countries. In December 2022, Truthdig published Kamin Mohammadi’s profile of Mahsa Jina Amini and the central role of the country’s Kurdish minority in Iran’s female-led uprising.[14][15]


Awards

[edit]

The section below is updated with the most recent awards. We also propose moving this section after the website for better context.

Replace “As of October 2017, Truthdig has won six Webby Awards, including four regular Webbys [16][17][18][19][20] and two Webby People's Voice Awards.[16][17][21] In 2007, it won both a regular Webby and a Webby People's Voice Award.[16][17] At the 2010 ceremony for the Webby Awards, which traditionally limit acceptance speeches to five words, Robert Scheer accepted on behalf of Truthdig, saying: "Wall Street—what fucking thieves."[1]


Truthdig and its individual journalists have won numerous awards from the Los Angeles Press Club, including five Southern California (SoCal) Journalism Awards in 2010, three in 2013,[22] and [23], and eleven in 2017.[24] The five SoCal awards from 2010 included four first-place awards, in the categories "Online Journalist", "Online Column/Commentary/Criticism", "Online Sports News/Feature/Commentary", and "Website, Exclusive to the Internet—Budget over 10K".[23] The three SoCal awards from 2013 included one first-place award, in the category "Website, News Organization, Exclusive to the Internet".[22] The eleven SoCal awards from 2017 included three first-place awards, in the categories "Editorial Cartoon", "Investigative", and "Political Column/Commentary—Election".[24]


As of October 2017, Truthdig journalists have won three Sigma Delta Chi Awards from the Society of Professional Journalists: two to cartoonist Mr. Fish (Dwayne Booth) in 2009 and 2010,[25][26] and one to Robert Scheer for "Online Column Writing (Independent)" in 2011.[27]


With “As of 2024, Truthdig has won six Webby Awards, four awards from the Society of Professional Journalists, and forty 40 first-place awards from the Los Angeles Press Club, among others. Since its relaunch in November 2022, the site Truthdig has won 19 awards from the Los Angeles Press Club, with six first- place awards including best election editorials and best foreign correspondent. Truthdig also won two Headliner awards[28], was a finalist for the best “Website - Independent Publishers” at the Webby Awards in 2023. [29] and received an honorable mention in the ‘Best Writing – Editorial 2022’ category from the Webby Awards. [30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37]


Cmedlock444 (talk) 20:12, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Cmedlock444: Hello. As a WP:COI editor, in general you should not be making edits to the article itself at all. The only exceptions would be non-controversial changes, such as reverting overt vandalism or fixing unambiguous typos.
In general, articles should favor sources which are both reliable and also independent. This means that Truthdig is a poor source for an article about Truthdig (since it is not independent of itself). Since Wikipedia is not a platform for promotion, it shouldn't be used as a trophy case. It's not good practice to just list awards (especially not using vague language such as "numerous"). Instead, use reliable, independent sources to list notable awards and if possible, contextualize why these awards are encyclopedically significant. The Headliner Awards, for example, do not appear notable, so using the Headliner Awards' own website to imply significance is promotional and inappropriate.
Based on your suggestions, I have made some changes, but they are not necessarily the changes you have proposed. I would suggest reevaluating this proposal based on WP:IS.
In the future, please focus on brevity when replying, as this is a volunteer project, and unlike you, we are not compensated for spending our time on this. Grayfell (talk) 20:38, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ a b Cite error: The named reference Leibowitz-2014-02-25 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  2. ^ "Case Summary". Los Angeles Superior Court. Retrieved 12 September 2024.
  3. ^ Cite error: The named reference Roderick-2005-12-12 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  4. ^ Cite error: The named reference Kaufman-interview-by-Ulyseas-2013 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  5. ^ "LA Times Fires Longtime Progressive Columnist Robert Scheer". Retrieved 12 September 2024.
  6. ^ "Eugenics in the Twenty-First Century: New Names, Old Ideas". Retrieved 17 September 2024.
  7. ^ "The Acronym Behind Our Wildest AI Dreams and Nightmares". Retrieved 17 September 2024.
  8. ^ "Update: Statement from Striking Truthdig Workers". Popular Resistance. March 27, 2020.
  9. ^ "Truthdig LLC: 31-CA-264453". National Labor Relations Board.
  10. ^ "Letter from the Publisher". Retrieved 17 September 2024.
  11. ^ "The Persecution of Julian Assange". Retrieved 17 September 2024.
  12. ^ "Inside West Virginia's Chernobyl". Retrieved 17 September 2024.
  13. ^ "A Slow-Rolling Disaster in Fracking Country". Retrieved 17 September 2024.
  14. ^ "Rieder: A global platform for bold journalists". Retrieved 17 September 2024.
  15. ^ "Global Voices Truthdig Women Reporting". Retrieved 17 September 2024.
  16. ^ a b c Cite error: The named reference Webby-Awards-search was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  17. ^ a b c Cite error: The named reference Webby-Awards-2007 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  18. ^ Cite error: The named reference Webby-Awards-2010 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  19. ^ Cite error: The named reference Webby-Awards-2011 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  20. ^ Cite error: The named reference Webby-Awards-2013 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  21. ^ Cite error: The named reference Webby-Awards-2014 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  22. ^ a b Cite error: The named reference LAPC-2013 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  23. ^ a b Cite error: The named reference LAPC-2010-06-27 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  24. ^ a b Cite error: The named reference LAPC-2017-06-25 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  25. ^ Cite error: The named reference SPJ-2010-05-03 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  26. ^ Cite error: The named reference SPJ-2011-05-10 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  27. ^ Cite error: The named reference SPJ-2011-Sigma-Delta-Chi was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  28. ^ "2024 headliner winners" (PDF). Retrieved 17 September 2024.
  29. ^ "Truthdig". Retrieved 17 September 2024.
  30. ^ "Truthdig". Retrieved 17 September 2024.
  31. ^ "Truthdig". Retrieved 17 September 2024.
  32. ^ "Truthdig". Retrieved 17 September 2024.
  33. ^ "Truthdig". Retrieved 17 September 2024.
  34. ^ "Truthdig". Retrieved 17 September 2024.
  35. ^ "Truthdig". Retrieved 17 September 2024.
  36. ^ "Truthdig". Retrieved 17 September 2024.
  37. ^ "Winners of 52nd Annual SoCal Journalism Awards Announced". Retrieved 17 September 2024.