Talk:Turk 182

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Firefighting

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firefighting, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to firefighting on Wikipedia! If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.FirefightingWikipedia:WikiProject FirefightingTemplate:WikiProject FirefightingFirefighting articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Star Wars?

Why is Star Wars referenced in the See Also?209.43.10.235 (talk) 02:08, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A vandal. Removed. Tempshill (talk) 17:13, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Turk

What has being a Turk got to do with this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.85.23.212 (talk) 10:37, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Read the synopsis. You'll understand. (professor2789 (talk) 07:59, 23 February 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Book?

I know it has been 25+ years, but I could swear that I read "Turk 182" in Junior High School as a book before it came out in movie form. However, I can find no reference or indication of the book preceeding the movie. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.210.27.106 (talk) 12:02, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Film rating

The page says that this was one of the first PG-13 movies, and one of the sources listed is this NY Times article: http://www.nytimes.com/movie/review?res=9D04E1D81439F936A25751C0A963948260

The problem is that the article states "Running time: 97 minutes. This film is rated R."

I am removing the article as a source because it directly contradicts what it is supposed to be a source for. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DugongAKAmanatee (talk • contribs) 12:58, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Queensborough"

The sign on the bridge said "Queensborough" because the "U" was necessary for the plot (spelling TURK). The only reference to this factoid I could find is here: https://www.nytimes.com/1984/07/05/nyregion/new-york-day-by-day-045274.html. I made that small change to the text, but didn't add the reference with a footnote. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danchall (talk • contribs) 17:48, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]