Jump to content

Talk:Typhoon Lupit (2009)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Importance

[edit]

Although I understand your view for this being mid-importance Jason Rees, considering the location of the storm, it's really a low-importance article. Albeit a Category 5, since the storm was in the Western Pacific, Category 5 really doesn't make it mid-importance since there is at least one Cat:5 in the basin each year. Also, there was little damage and no loss of life from the storm, overall, an easily forgetable typhoon. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 14:27, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The cat 5 wasnt why i upped it. I upped it because PAGASA were saying that Lupit took a really wierd track and are directly relating it to climate change.Jason Rees (talk) 14:30, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]