Talk:Typhoon Sarah (1989)

Typhoon Sarah (1989) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 4, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed

Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on September 14, 2023, and September 14, 2024.

Weather: Tropical / Western Pacific Mid‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tropical cyclones portal This article is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Pacific typhoon work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Typhoon Sarah (1989)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Hurricanehink (talk · contribs) 03:45, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"As the typhoon meandered near the Philippines" - does this mean "while", "because", or something else?
- Changed to while. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 13:33, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Impact in China in lede?
- There's not much to really say but if it's really necessary I'll add it. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 13:33, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"approximately 1,100 km (685 mi) southeast of Minamitorishima" - even though the last thing is linked, I'd give it some more meaning so it isn't so foreign. Perhaps "southeast of the Japanese island of X"?
- Added. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 13:33, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"complex interactions" - why quote? Who said it?
- That's about as in-depth of an explanation as the JTWC will give. Added who said it. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 13:33, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"In light of the improved environment" --> "Due to the improved environment"
- Changed. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 13:33, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Why did Sarah move faster toward Okinawa?
- Your guess is as good as mine (not stated in report). Cyclonebiskit (talk) 13:33, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"This faster movement was short-lived as by September 8" - awkward
- Reworded. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 13:33, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"Rivers began overtopping their banks on September 10 and inundated surrounding areas." - this could be simpler. I think "exceeding" would work better than "overtopping", and similar "flooding" over "inundated" (or something).
- Changed Cyclonebiskit (talk) 13:33, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"In Ilocos Sur, ten people were killed in a single town" - I'd prefer to see "In the province of Ilocos Sur", since it sounds like a city name and could be confusing. However, I didn't change it since I wasn't sure what you thought.
- Used suggestion. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 13:33, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You should indicate somewhere that all damage figures are 1989 USD, unless otherwise stated. It isn't clear in the Philippines section.
- Added Cyclonebiskit (talk) 13:33, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"Striking Taiwan as a powerful typhoon, destructive winds battered coastal areas near where the center moved ashore." - dangling participle
- I don't English good, plz to clarify what's wrong? Cyclonebiskit (talk) 13:33, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"Torrential were the main destructive force associated with Typhoon Sarah, however." - rains? floods? dogs? clocks? If it is rainfall, then that sentence and the subsequent one are redundant.
- Lions, bears, and tigers oh my! (Clocks??) Removed the quoted sentence since to avoid redundancy Cyclonebiskit (talk) 13:33, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
" In Hualien City, flood waters reached a depth of 1.2 m (3.9 ft) and several homes were destroyed, leaving roughly 100 people homeless." - did floods destroy the homes?
- It's not clearly stated what destroyed the homes. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 13:33, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"Twenty-eight homes were destroyed and another forty-one sustained damage across the island." - why not rewrite to avoid saying the full names of the numbers?
- Reworded Cyclonebiskit (talk) 13:33, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Anything else for Japan or China? Seems kinda scant for how much rainfall there was.
- Not that I could find. JTWC ATCR states no known damage in China from the storm. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 13:33, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

--♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 03:45, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pardon my tardiness in responding to this review. I believe you understand why it took me some time to get to this. I've responded to all your concerns but I'm a bit lost at a few (I think)...I'm a tad tired now so I really don't remember exactly what I wrote above. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 13:33, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]