A fact from Tyrannasorus rex appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 1 February 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Tyrannasorus rex is within the scope of WikiProject Beetles, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to beetles. For more information, visit the project page.BeetlesWikipedia:WikiProject BeetlesTemplate:WikiProject Beetlesbeetle articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Insects, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of insects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InsectsWikipedia:WikiProject InsectsTemplate:WikiProject InsectsInsects articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Caribbean, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to the countries of the Caribbean on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines.CaribbeanWikipedia:WikiProject CaribbeanTemplate:WikiProject CaribbeanCaribbean articles
Thank you for commenting! I wish it was not the last one on the list, but if it worked that well for you, I suppose the placement does not affect it too much :) Surtsicna (talk) 12:57, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you both. The article, created by Soap in 2007, is older than my account, but I only found out about it a few weeks ago and thought I should share it with the rest of Wiki readers. I am glad the bug got its 15 minutes of fame :) Surtsicna (talk) 23:27, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I am sorry that you feel that way. I assumed that those who took interest in the article would have it on their watchlist and that they would notice a fivefold expansion. Surtsicna (talk) 23:19, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I also performed a significant expansion. I took this and turned it into this when the article was in its earliest stages. It is on my watchlist, but nothing about a DYK nom appeared. -- Scjessey (talk) 14:22, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Re: placement last. Usually the quirkiest hook in a set is put there, as people usually only remember the first and last entry in a list. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:13, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]