Talk:Tzav
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 17 February 2008. The result of the discussion was Keep. |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
File:Thomas Hobbes (portrait).jpg Nominated for Deletion
[edit]![]() |
An image used in this article, File:Thomas Hobbes (portrait).jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests February 2012
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Thomas Hobbes (portrait).jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:02, 12 February 2012 (UTC) |
Discussion
[edit]- REQUEST: Please see the centralized discussion about this subject, relating to sources, links, content, etc at Talk:Chayei Sarah (parsha). Thank you, IZAK (talk) 09:14, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
Leviticus 6 is a Bible chapter, not a parashah
[edit]There is no justification for Leviticus 6, which is also part of the Christian Bible, automatically linking to a rabbinical discussion of a parashah.
A majority of potential users of English Wikipedia are not practicing Jews. I will elaborate: a majority are not Jewish, and not all Jews are practicing Judaism and rabbinical studies, but all these people are potentially interested in the Bible for their own cultural and religious reasons. Therefore, when the topic is a particular Bible verse shared by Jews AND Christians and, frankly, the entire humanity, the Bible passage is of interest, not (just) the parasha & discussion in Judaism. Thank you for considering this.
The discussion can be concentrated on this page. Arminden (talk) 11:33, 22 September 2020 (UTC)