Jump to content

Talk:U.S. Route 40 Scenic

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleU.S. Route 40 Scenic has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 12, 2012Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:U.S. Route 40 Scenic/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Rp0211 (talk · contribs) 02:08, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:


Infobox

[edit]
  • No issues

Lead

[edit]
  • No issues

Route description

[edit]
  • No issues

History

[edit]
  • No issues

Junction list

[edit]
  • No issues

References

[edit]
  • No issues


After thoroughly reviewing this article, I have concluded that it meets the good article criteria at this time. Awesome job and keep up the good work! Rp0211 (talk2me) 21:13, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]