Talk:U.S. Route 64 in Oklahoma
Appearance
![]() | U.S. Route 64 in Oklahoma has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: August 8, 2014. (Reviewed version). |
![]() | A fact from U.S. Route 64 in Oklahoma appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 17 December 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:U.S. Route 64 in Oklahoma/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Fredddie (talk · contribs) 16:55, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
I will review this article some time in the next 24 hours. –Fredddie™ 16:55, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar):
b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- MOS:FRAC urges consistent usage of fractions or decimals. Since all of the fractions seem to be cited to the county section maps, I'd guess that they're approximate distances. If I were you, I'd try to convert the decimals to fractions. for consistency's sake.
- a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- I would like to see more non-ODOT references
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Just need to get some consistency in the decimals and fractions. I'm not going to hold up the GAN for more non-ODOT references, but I wouldn't take it past GAN without them. –Fredddie™ 01:23, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail:
- @Fredddie: the decimals should be eliminated. Let me know if you see anything I missed. —Scott5114↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 05:53, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
- Looks fine. Passing. –Fredddie™ 01:10, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
- @Fredddie: the decimals should be eliminated. Let me know if you see anything I missed. —Scott5114↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 05:53, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Engineering and technology good articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- GA-Class U.S. Highway system articles
- Mid-importance U.S. Highway system articles
- GA-Class Road transport articles
- Mid-importance Road transport articles
- U.S. Highway system articles
- GA-Class Oklahoma road transport articles
- Mid-importance Oklahoma road transport articles
- Oklahoma road transport articles
- U.S. Roads portal selected articles
- GA-Class U.S. road transport articles
- Mid-importance U.S. road transport articles
- U.S. road transport articles
- GA-Class Oklahoma articles
- High-importance Oklahoma articles