Talk:UFC on Fuel TV: Gustafsson vs. Silva
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the UFC on Fuel TV: Gustafsson vs. Silva article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
File:UFC on FUEL 2.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion
[edit]![]() |
An image used in this article, File:UFC on FUEL 2.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 2 March 2012
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:UFC on FUEL 2.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 21:50, 2 March 2012 (UTC) |
This page seems to be vandalised, fighter names have been changed to ridiculous celebrities and terrorists. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.255.94.129 (talk) 22:19, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
someone needs to lock this page. i don't think i can. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CruzeiroMMA (talk • contribs) 22:29, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. CruzeiroMMA (talk) 22:40, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Not done: requests for changes to the page protection level should be made at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. --Redrose64 (talk) 22:49, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
Excellent, Stand-Alone Article.
[edit]- Comment. I am simply going to say that these stand-alone UFC articles are excellent and have always been very well-kept-up. They are concise, useful, informative, extremely notable (seeing as how the UFC is talked about by multiple news companies and now has a deal with FOX Broadcasting), and should stay in the stand-alone format. I know there is a small group of people (three or four, from what I can tell) who are attempting to make large, cumbersome articles containing all the data from a year's worth of UFC events, but this mishap is sure to upset many people who are used to the usefulness and efficiency of Wikipedia and its goals, to inform people in an efficient manner. So, again, this is just a kudos to whoever created this article. Thank you. Also, please message me for any discussions where-in this conversation is taking place, I would like to be updated with this sort of thing so that no more small-scale "votes" go by where only a few (out of the hundreds of thousands) of fans get to participate to negate the majority (five to two). LogicalCreator (talk) 09:09, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
- Comment. I'd really like these pages to stay--they are my go to source for UFC stuff.75.136.223.186 (talk) 20:34, 21 April 2012 (UTC)a fan
- Comment. As a pre-emptive post before the inevitable AfD: This event is notable for the reason stated on the page itself: "This was the first UFC event held in Sweden and was the fastest selling European event in UFC history", and should not be subject to deletion.76.103.153.126 (talk) 02:08, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
- Comment. Glad to see this page for a UFC on Fuel event survive. How can we revive the others from deletion? It totally throws off the Event Chronology when they did the redirects. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.67.19.113 (talk) 01:15, 22 May 2012 (UTC)