Talk:Unrestricted Hartree–Fock

Physics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chemistry Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merge with Hartree-Fock method

I oppose a merge, as this is a useful article on a technique that chemists use and find surprising so need separate information on it. Please make sure that the chemists have a say on it. Whatever happens, the same should be done with Restricted Open-shell Hartree-Fock, again something that probably interests chemists more than physicists. --Bduke (talk) 07:17, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am going to add Gaston Berthier's name to be associated with the UHF method. It's rather poor form when the discoverer of the set of these equations isn't even acknowledged. It's widely known that Berthier presented his equations at one of Lowdin's meetings, where John Pople was present, and where he expressed rather negative opinions about the work. Only a few months later, Pople had published his article on the UHF method with Nesbet! --dylan. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dylan.jayatilaka (talk • contribs) 14:41, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]