Talk:V Bomber Command
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the V Bomber Command article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cleanup
[edit]I am putting an expand tag here
because some of the facts listed in the sections are unclear. Also, the top section needs to be written in sentences. J. Finkelstein 01:29, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
I agree that V Bomber Command and 5th Bomber Command should be merged. They really seem to be the same thing. Someone just needs to figure out which name is the most common and merge the articles into one.Glennfcowan 03:30, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
- V Bomber Command is the more common name for this type of USAF unit. - NDCompuGeek 03:34, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia articles that use American English
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class military aviation articles
- Military aviation task force articles
- C-Class North American military history articles
- North American military history task force articles
- C-Class United States military history articles
- United States military history task force articles