Talk:Variants of SARS-CoV-2
![]() | Variants of SARS-CoV-2 was a Natural sciences good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Variants of SARS-CoV-2.
|
![]() | Text and/or other creative content from this version of Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2#Strains and variants was copied or moved into Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 variants with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
![]() | Text and/or other creative content from this version of 501.V2 Variant was copied or moved into Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 variants with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
![]() | Text and/or other creative content from this version of Cluster 5 was copied or moved into Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 variants with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
![]() | Text and/or other creative content from this version of VOC-202012/01 was copied or moved into Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 variants with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Variants of SARS-CoV-2 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 60 days ![]() |
![]() | The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to COVID-19, broadly construed, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
![]() | WikiProject COVID-19 consensus WikiProject COVID-19 aims to add to and build consensus for pages relating to COVID-19. They have so far discussed items listed below. Please discuss proposed improvements to them at the project talk page.
To ensure you are viewing the current list, you may wish to . |
![]() | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Tang paper / Retraction watch
[edit]Retraction watch has flagged an erratum re the Tang paper. The authors write: "We now recognize that within the context of our study the term “aggressive” is misleading and should be replaced by a more precise term “a higher frequency”. In short, while we have shown that the two lineages naturally co-exist, we provided no evidence supporting any epidemiological conclusion regarding the virulence or pathogenicity of SARS-CoV-2..." My impression is that the elements of the retraction don't affect the words currently used in this article. Could this be checked by an expert? Yadsalohcin (talk) 08:44, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- thank you for post--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 18:13, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Historical variant sections need re-factoring
[edit]As of the current version of 18:17, 10 July 2024, we have three sections that are useful (especially since there is no point having all the descendants of Omicron listed in SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant, and nobody seems to be trying to add them there anyway), but don't quite make sense in terms of the overall structure of the article. They should be shifted to be either earlier or later than the three VOC, VOI, and VUM stand-alone sections, or be integrated into a single section:
- Variants of SARS-CoV-2#Overview of historical variants of concern or under monitoring
- Variants of SARS-CoV-2#Variant of concern lineages under monitoring (WHO) - which has a good table
- Variants of SARS-CoV-2#Previously circulating and formerly monitored variants (WHO)
I'm not sure how these should be re-organised, but it seems to me that the main principle should be that we don't want a particular variant to be listed multiple times in detail in these sections - because then people won't know which entry is the main one to read or edit.
My initial proposal is that integrating Variants of SARS-CoV-2#Overview of historical variants of concern or under monitoring and Variants of SARS-CoV-2#Variant of concern lineages under monitoring (WHO) into the three respective sections of Variants of SARS-CoV-2#Previously circulating and formerly monitored variants (WHO) would make the most sense, possibly addding one or two extra subsections e.g. for a table.
This is mainly a problem of lack of media attention to SARS-CoV-2 since 2021-ish: less media attention leads to less Wikipedia editing.
Please give any arguments for or against this proposal, or describe alternative proposals on how to reorganise these sections. Boud (talk) 18:33, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
- will look--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:45, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
- Former good article nominees
- C-Class Molecular Biology articles
- Low-importance Molecular Biology articles
- C-Class Genetics articles
- Low-importance Genetics articles
- WikiProject Genetics articles
- All WikiProject Molecular Biology pages
- C-Class COVID-19 articles
- High-importance COVID-19 articles
- WikiProject COVID-19 articles
- C-Class medicine articles
- Low-importance medicine articles
- C-Class emergency medicine and EMS articles
- Mid-importance emergency medicine and EMS articles
- Emergency medicine and EMS task force articles
- C-Class society and medicine articles
- Mid-importance society and medicine articles
- Society and medicine task force articles
- C-Class pulmonology articles
- High-importance pulmonology articles
- Pulmonology task force articles
- All WikiProject Medicine pages
- C-Class virus articles
- Mid-importance virus articles
- WikiProject Viruses articles