Talk:Venus Callipyge

Greece Mid‑importance

	Greece portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Classical Greece and Rome Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sculpture

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sculpture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sculpture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SculptureWikipedia:WikiProject SculptureTemplate:WikiProject Sculpturesculpture articles

Women's History B‑class Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
B	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 17:01, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ancient examples, plural?

Only one ancient example is given (not counting the modern copies). Is there in fact only one example extant? 213.122.1.147 (talk) 01:21, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gender of Aphrodite

Any particular reason why the adjective is not declined to be feminine? The name of this article reads as if an editor did a backwards calc of Callipygian Venus into transliterated Greek using the words supplied by Miriam Webster (where kallipygos is given as masculine, which is natural enough in isolation) and applied it without knowledge to Aphrodite. Applying a masculine adjective to a goddess is not good Greek, as far as I know. Rwflammang (talk) 18:38, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, to answer my own question, apparently callipygos is a two-termination second declension adjective, so while its form looks masculine to a latinist, it is actually feminine. Rwflammang (talk) 12:41, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It is a compound adjective, so two-termination, as every schoolboy used to know (though the rule is not universal: e.g. athanatos in Sappho's Tithonus poem has a feminine form). Seadowns (talk) 14:03, 16 November 2017 (UTC) Seadowns (talk) 14:28, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Brassens relevance

I've just inserted a different link that goes straight to the Brassens song lyrics, rather than to the home page of a site that now concentrates on video and karaoke. But I fail to see the relevance of the comment on La Fontaine in the text, or the lines in the Brassens song that correspond to the quote given at the end of the article. Ohuanam (talk) 23:15, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The French version of this page has a lengthy La Fontaine quote. I suspect a curtailed cross-reference has veiled the content. I'll rewrite the last para of the main article in English to reflect that. If anyone thinks that's inappropriate, say so! Ohuanam (talk) 19:28, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Paragraph re-written with links to original texts (as notes) and clarification in text as to who references whom and which text is cited/quoted/translated. Hope everyone concurs! Ohuanam (talk) 20:50, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Transliteration

I have long been annoyed by the macaronic transliteration in the name of this article. Shouldn't it be pure Latin, Venus Callipyga, or pure Greek, Aphrodite Kallipygos (Callipygos)? Rwflammang (talk) 00:08, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I intend to rename this article to either the Latin Venus Callipyge or the Hellenic Aphrodite Kallipygos. Anyone have a preference? Rwflammang (talk) 16:00, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, WP:COMMON doesn't appear to help us out much here, as the statue doesn't appear to be known by one of these various related names over the others. I might prefer with "Venus Callipyge" only because the surviving statue is Roman, and it appears to be in common use.--Cúchullain ^t/c 16:23, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 03:03, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Venus Kallipygos → Venus Callipyge – Avoid macaronic term per talk above. Rwflammang (talk) 01:13, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Was the restorers' decision about the head position incorrect?

Is there any indication the original statue wouldn't have the head positioned that way? --TiagoTiago (talk) 00:38, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Venus Callipyge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060427073454/http://www.insecula.com:80/oeuvre/O0007430.html to http://www.insecula.com/oeuvre/O0007430.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:21, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Type of statue or specific statue

My understanding of this article is that the specific statue in Naples is - at least now - its subject. This was not always the case (see this ancient diff), but to my understanding now the specific statue is firmly the article's subject. If this is so we will have to untangle the interwikilinks and the Commons categories, because they deal with the type of statue and not the specific example in Naples. Are there any views on this? If not I hope that I - or somebody else - will in the future untangle this mess. Best wishes! WatkynBassett (talk) 19:24, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]