Talk:VirtualGL
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the VirtualGL article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]I copied the background page of VirtualGL.SourceForge.Net. Yes, I know that's a bad thing, but I currently don't have time to edit it. If someone could wikify this page and remove all copyrighted wording (don't know what license the original page had) that would help. Jdm64 15:35, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
- I was able to cut the article down a little bit, but it's still too long and not wikified! Jdm64 15:44, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah, this article definitely needs to be wikified. Also, since it was taken from the page it doesn't have NPOV. The license on the original page was CC, however it states we have to cite it as the original source. I'm adding a wikify template to the article, maybe that will help. Psychcf (talk) 01:18, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
- There appears to be an unanimous opinion about the article: it needs some wikifying and/or revamping. What bothers me (it never fails) is that someone, who most probably doesn't understand the subject matter, inserted an offending tag about it not meeting the "general notability guideline" and needing to "establish its notability". The article, the effort to have created it, and the knowledge behind it (obviously beyond whoever inserted the obnoxious tag), deserve some respect. I've removed the tag. Regards, --AVM (talk) 23:22, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
- The text needs at least attribution, maybe more. I've tagged in the meantime. Widefox; talk 09:48, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
- There appears to be an unanimous opinion about the article: it needs some wikifying and/or revamping. What bothers me (it never fails) is that someone, who most probably doesn't understand the subject matter, inserted an offending tag about it not meeting the "general notability guideline" and needing to "establish its notability". The article, the effort to have created it, and the knowledge behind it (obviously beyond whoever inserted the obnoxious tag), deserve some respect. I've removed the tag. Regards, --AVM (talk) 23:22, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, this article definitely needs to be wikified. Also, since it was taken from the page it doesn't have NPOV. The license on the original page was CC, however it states we have to cite it as the original source. I'm adding a wikify template to the article, maybe that will help. Psychcf (talk) 01:18, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class Computing articles
- Low-importance Computing articles
- C-Class software articles
- Low-importance software articles
- C-Class software articles of Low-importance
- All Software articles
- C-Class Computer science articles
- Low-importance Computer science articles
- C-Class Free and open-source software articles
- Low-importance Free and open-source software articles
- C-Class Free and open-source software articles of Low-importance
- All Free and open-source software articles
- All Computing articles
- C-Class computer graphics articles
- Low-importance computer graphics articles
- WikiProject Computer graphics articles
- C-Class Technology articles
- WikiProject Technology articles