Talk:WHO-DT

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Television stations task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Missouri Low‑importance

	Missouri portal This article is part of WikiProject Missouri, a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of Missouri. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MissouriWikipedia:WikiProject MissouriTemplate:WikiProject MissouriMissouri articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Iowa

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	Iowa portal This article is supported by WikiProject Iowa (assessed as Low-importance).

Seller

Who Are They Going To Sell WHO-TV TO? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 205.221.56.133 (talk • contribs) .

Don't know yet. I'm sure we'll know once an announcement is made. --Iowahwyman 17:25, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Page protection

I appreciate the page protection while this dispute can be solved. We have an IP editor who believes the call letters of the station to be WHO-HD, not WHO-DT. A quick glance at the FCC database for WHO-HD shows nothing [1]. A glance at the FCC database for WHO-DT shows the proper call sign [2]. That is the dispute, and that is the evidence. More evidence of WHO-DT call letters is here: [3] --ḾỊḼʘɴίcả • Talk • _{I DX for fun!} 22:00, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have created a section regarding the probable edit warring occurring here [4]. I am not the only editor who has been reverting this IP's edits. --ḾỊḼʘɴίcả • Talk • _{I DX for fun!} 22:20, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Adding unreferenced entries of former employees to lists containing BLP material

Hello, Please do not add unreferenced names as entries to a list of former employees in articles. Including this type of material in articles does not abide by current consensus and its inclusion is strongly discouraged in our policies and guidelines. The rationales are as follows:

WP:NOT tells us, Wikipedia is "not an indiscriminate collection of information." As that section describes, just because something is true, doesn't necessarily mean the info belongs in Wikipedia.
As per WP:V, we cannot include information in Wikipedia that is not verifiable and sourced.
WP:NLIST tells us that lists included within articles (including people's names) are subject to the same need for references as any other information in the article.
Per WP:BLP, we have to be especially careful about including un-sourced info about living persons.

If you look at articles about companies in general, you will not find mention of previous employees, except in those cases where the employee was particularly notable. Even then, the information is not presented just as a list of names, but is incorporated into the text itself (for example, when a company's article talks about the policies a previous CEO had, or when they mention the discovery/invention of a former engineer/researcher). If a preexisting article is already in the encyclopedia for the person you want to add to a list, it's generally regarded as sufficient to support their inclusion in list material in another article. 70.48.216.22 (talk) 00:45, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on WHO-DT. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110927095009/http://www.whotv.com/about/station/who-whohd-number-1-in-may-ratings-20110624,0,7912668.story to http://www.whotv.com/about/station/who-whohd-number-1-in-may-ratings-20110624,0,7912668.story

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:18, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Meredith getting WHO-TV

https://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/money/business/2018/03/05/could-meredith-buy-who-tv-kdsm/394843002/

http://www.adweek.com/tvspy/is-meredith-interested-in-buying-sinclair-stations/201479

On March 6th, 2018 Des Moines Register reported that Meredith is one of the parties interested in getting WHO-TV from Tribune due to the Sinclair/Tribune deal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.169.130.165 (talk) 18:36, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in WHO-DT

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of WHO-DT's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "tvnc-nexstarspinoffs":

From KFSM-TV: "Nexstar Selling 19 TVs In 15 Markets For $1.32B". TVNewsCheck. NewsCheckMedia. March 20, 2019. Retrieved March 20, 2019.
From WTKR: "Nexstar Selling 19 TVs In 15 Markets For $1.32B". TVNewsCheck. NewsCheckMedia. March 20, 2019. Retrieved March 20, 2019.
From WTVR-TV: Mark K. Miller (March 20, 2019). "Nexstar Selling 19 TVs In 15 Markets For $1.32B". TVNewsCheck. NewsCheck Media.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:55, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Involving the NTM deal

It appears that Scripps just have Nexstar Tribune Media an option to buy back Tribune's east coast flagship WPIX between April 2020 and December 2021. And gosh, what a costly deal it would be. So in order to compensate for the buyback of WPIX back to NTM (on behalf of Tribune), it may have to sell Channel 13 to cross-town company Meredith Corporation, which will make it their flagship property.

What do you think? RevinCBHatol (talk) 03:23, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

13.4 Programming Change

Recently the Iowa's Weather Channel programming was brought back on 13.4. I would like to edit this into the article, but I do not know the exact date this change took effect. Does anyone know when this took effect? Floppa-Lover (talk) 19:20, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]