Talk:Walking with the Enemy

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Film: American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.
	This article needs an image (preferably free) related to the subject, such as a picture of the set or a film poster. Please ensure that non-free content guidelines are properly observed.

Story of Raoul Wallenberg?

Could this film also be based on the work that Raoul Wallenberg had done in Budapest?

I thought this article from Yad Vashem might be of interest.

http://www.yadvashem.org/yv/en/righteous/stories/wallenberg.asp

smrgeog (talk) 10:00, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I added Wallenberg because that is part of the history of the Jews in Budapest, it might not be in the plot of the film. For anyone who might know more, feel free to remove the reference or discuss it on the Talk page.

smrgeog (talk) 10:16, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality Problems -- Big Time

I applied the POV template to this article because -- well -- someone just dropped the publicity text into the editor and published it as an "article." Check out the text here at the studio's website, then compare it to what's in the Wiki article. They are verbatim identical. Worse, the text doesn't even *sound* neutral. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LiteratePervert (talk • contribs) 17:04, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, I would recommending removing the entire section unless the whole section can be re-written according NPOV guidelines. smrgeog (talk) 07:33, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I went ahead and deleted the section in question. --Literate Pervert (talk) 05:11, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I looked through the entire article, it needs a complete re-write; it is not balanced, and appears to be a verbatim copy of the film's promotional material. I would prefer a brief synopsis of what the film is about without giving away too much. smrgeog (talk) 07:16, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I changed the summary to reflect a more neutral tone. I did not want to add to much detail as it is a newly released film and it would not be appropriate to give too much of the plot away.smrgeog (talk) 07:35, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]