Walthamstow Wetlands is within the scope of WikiProject Lakes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of lake-related articles on Wikipedia, using the tools on the project page. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LakesWikipedia:WikiProject LakesTemplate:WikiProject LakesLakes articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Agreed, and having read both articles, I propose that Walthamstow Reservoirs be merged into Walthamstow Wetlands. I think that the content in the former article can easily be absorbed into, and explained in the wider context of the latter, and the Wetlands article is of a reasonable size that the merging of Walthamstow Reservoirs will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. Grunners (talk) 10:57, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure the whole of Walthamstow Reservoirs are included in the Wetlands? Ctually (5 minutes later) I just checked and yes all 10 reservoirs are part of the Wetlands, even if not all is accessible to the public. ProfDEH (talk) 05:44, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The merger might be complete in that there is only the one article, but the text really needs to be properly merged. Two info boxes for example can't be anything other than a temporary fix. ProfDEH (talk) 17:52, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]