Talk:Weetzie Bat
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Copy edit
[edit]I performed a copy-edit of this page. While doing so, I noticed two problems in the "Reception" section:
- The quote attributed to Mercier is actually part of a review of the book Girl Goddess #9 and does not directly refer to Weetzie Bat. Therefore, its inclusion in this article is questionable, especially since the article text specifically ties Mercier's statement to Weetzie Bat.
- The citation given for the B.G. Censorship Watch does not, in fact, contain the stated quotation—at least not in the version available at the ALA's website. Was this article different in the paper version?
// Macwhiz (talk) 19:02, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
Those two-year-old problems are serious. Are they obsolete?
- Reception continued
Today I inserted this comment at the head of section Reception (as I improved the 2009 Phoenix Award coverage, which should not be the lead sentence):
This section needs some attention to chronology. Readers should not need the reference publ dates for that. What was the contemporary reception? (beside winning no major annual book award, a negative that is equally true of most books, even most books with Wikipedia articles)
- Start-Class novel articles
- Low-importance novel articles
- Novel has infobox needing 1st edition cover
- WikiProject Novels articles
- Start-Class children and young adult literature articles
- Mid-importance children and young adult literature articles
- Articles copy edited by the Guild of Copy Editors
- Start-Class Women writers articles
- Mid-importance Women writers articles
- WikiProject Women articles
- WikiProject Women writers articles