Talk:Wellspring camps

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Wellspring camps article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past.

Health and fitness Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Health and fitness, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of health and physical fitness related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Health and fitnessWikipedia:WikiProject Health and fitnessTemplate:WikiProject Health and fitnessHealth and fitness articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

== RFC ==How much does it cost?

I've added some tags to this article, as it originally read rather like a PR piece for the company.  Would appreciate some thoughts on whether the article still warrants the tags. --Oscarthecat (talk) 16:00, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is a really well written and researched article. It's just not an encyclopedia article. It's a fact-based brochure for Wellspring. I know there are articles on many many private companies on Wikipedia, but this is different. It doesn't talk about company history, ownership, structure, income, market share, or anything providing perspective on how it fits into the industry as a whole. Considering that the generic article Fat camp is short, not very well written and has few references and Weight loss resort is a stub, it would make sense to combine this article with the Fat Camp article and try to make it more general, but retain all the great facts and statistics as it does provide information about the capabilities of a "fat camp." --Jaywilson (talk) 11:12, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This page is a business listing, complete with bias reviews. Is Wikipedia now a forum for businesses? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.191.17.39 (talk) 22:02, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This article reads like an advert

This article reads like an advertisement. it is not objective, and looks like it may have been written by someone close to the company. not quite sure how to flag this.--122.99.121.110 (talk) 18:20, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]