Talk:Where the Truth Lies
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
NC17
[edit]Is the first thing you want to convey about the film the fact that it didn't get a 17+ rating in the US, surely this should be much further down the article! Why not write about the fact that it got an 18 certificate in the UK in that case?
The order makes no sense, so I've changed it. Gomez2002 (talk) 13:53, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
Story lining
[edit]- To me the solution of the whodunit, like it's told, is just a may be and not nescessarly the truth. The whole mixture of genres and Karen as an investingator are unconvincable either. To many possiblities throw the story out of focus.The possible lines fade out and the servants motive for murder isn't any.Rich colour and nudes aren't enough to do a good movie!--Danaide (talk) 14:33, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Where the Truth Lies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090115223832/http://www.rollingstone.com:80/reviews/movie/7567564/review/8088401/where_the_truth_lies to http://www.rollingstone.com/reviews/movie/7567564/review/8088401/where_the_truth_lies
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:28, 12 January 2016 (UTC)