Jump to content

Talk:Whitehaven R.L.F.C.

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Assessed as "Start" standard with "High" importance. A section on amateur RL in the area may be useful, as would some photographs (particularly any from previous eras) and an expanded section on notable players. Tim Fellows 03:49, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Formation date

[edit]

Why does the infobox have a formation date of 1866 and the main article say the club was formed in 1948? Is there a source for the earlier date?

Also, Rugby league didnt even split until 1895, so the early date seems a bit nonsenscial.Footix2 (talk) 13:42, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It could have been formed as a rugby football club before the two codes split. But no idea about the descrepancy. I would be surprised if Whitehaven was only founded in 1948 tbh, I believe the club is a lot older than that. Mattlore (talk) 20:05, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
1948 is correct. Rugby league was played in the area before this time but the semi-pro club dates from 1948. No idea why "1866" is listed.GordyB (talk) 22:11, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rugby league ground in Whitehaven prior to 1933?

[edit]

According to rugbyleagueproject.org, Cumberland played Australia on Saturday 24 October 1908 in Whitehaven. As the the Recreation Ground did not have its "ground broken" until 1933, where in Whitehaven was this match played? Or was the match played on the site of Whitehaven RLFC's Recreation Ground, but before the stands were built? Best Regards DynamoDegsy (talk) 08:12, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Whitehaven R.L.F.C.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:50, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]