Talk:William Cadman

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an image or photograph of William Cadman be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because it's obviously notable - the man who translated the Bible into a major Asian language, Vietnamese, and has it named after him as the Cadman version isn't notable??. Good grief :( In ictu oculi (talk) 17:28, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm. See edit history of nominator leading to this. Cough. In ictu oculi (talk) 17:46, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There a hundreds of people who have translated the bible into hundreds of languages. I don't see why this one is notable why the others arn't. Cough back.--ARTEST4ECHO (^talk/_contribs) 13:29, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dating needed re restoration of grave

Having previously read the article on the cemetery before reading this one, I have raised a citation need against the statement the local Protestant church 'recently' restored their grave. According to the cemetery article the cemetery was razed in 1983 by the communist city authorities and recreated as a public park. The restoration ought to be dated so to ascertain if the event was pre-demolition or post-demolition.Cloptonson (talk) 16:45, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]